MAP Forum

My point is that popularity is irrelevant for whether or not something goes against the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. The supreme court isn't a popularity contest. This is not merely a matter of popularity. It's far more nuanced than that. It's a matter of sensibilities, current ra...

Why? The goals we're trying to achieve haven't been achieved before, so doesn't that mean we'll have to try new approaches and methods? This is not a completely unique movement, nor is it a cookie cutter duplicate of another movement. Several factors of this movement have parallels to other movemen...

Wow!

Glad you made, Keegs!

If you're wondering who this is, it's Rev from VoA

I understand that my opinions (not the way I have expressed them) have ruffled some feathers in the past, as I have not agreed to much of these positions. It's important that all positions any major movement takes relies strongly on historical precedent (i.e. knowing something worked for other movem...

Over the years, and after consider research of evidence in favor of the position, I have come to the conclusion of three things: 1. Each major issue MAPs face is mirrored by a similar issue for minors 2. These issues faced by minors are a result of our current laws against MAPs, not in spite of thos...

BLueRibbon wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:17 pm Please let us know if you'd like to contribute any articles to Mu.

Thank you for the warm welcome, BlueRibbon!

I would love to see considerable collaboration between ALM and Mu

Greetings, Everyone! While my name here is different, I'm sure all of you will know me from my name on VoA; Revolution (most call me Rev for short). I have decided to join here because of a serious need for a sane means forward that has historic precedent to pull from. I appreciate the efforts under...