Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
-
KylieTCheung
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:07 am
Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
Class socioeconomic structures are more important than the sexuality and other liberal idpol activism that passes as radical politics.
- BLueRibbon
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:03 pm
Re: Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
Would you care to elaborate?
- Puerto Lobos
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2025 5:06 am
Re: Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
no war but class war
still would caution against ignoring the insights of other revolutions. just because it isn't the ultimate struggle doesn't mean they don't have valuable ideas
still would caution against ignoring the insights of other revolutions. just because it isn't the ultimate struggle doesn't mean they don't have valuable ideas
- PorcelainLark
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm
Re: Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
What's the evidence that communist regimes free MAPs?
What can an eternity of damnation matter to someone who has felt, if only for a second, the infinity of delight? - Charles Baudelaire
Re: Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
Obviously I'm not a communist but The soviet union abolished age of consent laws and all laws on homosexuality as well as other laws for a short period. They blanket struck down thousands of laws from the Tsar, it wasn't intentional gay and map liberation in the way we would understand it. Its just repealing 1000s of laws including those ones by blanket defilement of the old Russian order.
Most communist would be hostile towards pedos though I admit Antifa is a mixed bag of potential support though mostly anti.
Re: Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
Social class does not exist.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
- PorcelainLark
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm
Re: Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
But you get what I mean, right? Even if communism isn't inherently opposed to MAPs, that doesn't mean communists will liberate us.zarkle wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 3:25 am Obviously I'm not a communist but The soviet union abolished age of consent laws and all laws on homosexuality as well as other laws for a short period. They blanket struck down thousands of laws from the Tsar, it wasn't intentional gay and map liberation in the way we would understand it. Its just repealing 1000s of laws including those ones by blanket defilement of the old Russian order.
Most communist would be hostile towards pedos though I admit Antifa is a mixed bag of potential support though mostly anti.
What do you mean? That it's a social construct? So are laws, but they still have an objective effect on us.
What can an eternity of damnation matter to someone who has felt, if only for a second, the infinity of delight? - Charles Baudelaire
Re: Anti-classism and lbidinal economic-centric CIA psyops
Do you mean laws that divide people into social class? That would be the only comparison I see between laws and social class.PorcelainLark wrote: Thu Mar 12, 2026 8:20 pmBut you get what I mean, right? Even if communism isn't inherently opposed to MAPs, that doesn't mean communists will liberate us.zarkle wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 3:25 am Obviously I'm not a communist but The soviet union abolished age of consent laws and all laws on homosexuality as well as other laws for a short period. They blanket struck down thousands of laws from the Tsar, it wasn't intentional gay and map liberation in the way we would understand it. Its just repealing 1000s of laws including those ones by blanket defilement of the old Russian order.
Most communist would be hostile towards pedos though I admit Antifa is a mixed bag of potential support though mostly anti.
What do you mean? That it's a social construct? So are laws, but they still have an objective effect on us.
Laws are passed by acts defined by rules of that country. That could be an act of congress/parliament, court ruling or referendum. The laws can be subject to veto. The opposition will scrutinize every section of the bill.
Social class is not defined. How do you define social class. Is it net worth? Is it birthright? Is it salary? It is possible for someone from a wealthy family not to have a salary. It is possible that someone could be making more in commissions than someone with a salary. Let's not forget people with private pension funds. I hear surveys of people being put into different classes. They change the definition to suit themselves. It like when they divide people into generations. All a load of nonsense.
Yes, laws are objective but I fail to see how social class is.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
