Have a look at this enemy

[galileo2333]

"Danielle's Advocacy" is the name.

https://youtu.be/rrR_ym4DC6w?feature=shared

[mrlolicon93]

I fucking hate this bitch she is a crybaby.

[PorcelainLark]

Nose ring theory is right again.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/septum-theory

Hey! My GL logo was in the video.

Don't really agree with galilodnxix's interpretation of "What were you wearing"; the idea is more about rape culture than about anti-contact positions. The argument is that just because a woman wears something provocative, doesn't mean they no longer have the right to say "no". It's in that context where a woman being assaulted is asked what they're wearing; basically it can come across as tone deaf and victim blaming. So, hypothetically you could be pro-contact and against the idea that what a woman's wearing can be blamed for sexual assault.

Fighting for the right to harm children

Given the phrasing about of some of galilodnxix's comments concerning "What were you wearing", I can see why they might get that impression. Though I'm guessing that's not what galilodnxix had in mind.

When they spread these messages online they don't need nor are they looking for you to change your mind to agree with them, they're simply just looking for other people who do think like them. And all they need from you is for you to not take it seriously...

I don't know about that, if we want to change laws, why wouldn't we want to change people's minds to agree with us?

Report to the FBI or homeland security

I don't think this person understands that it's legal to disagree with other people. Advocating for changing a law isn't the same as breaking it. Are they going to say everyone who argues cannabis should be legal are criminals who need to be reported to the FBI? What?

How genuinely terrifying it is that these predators feel so comfortable coming in a public online space and declaring these beliefs without any fear of any sort of retaliation or accountability being had... Child sexual abuse is serious...

I don't understand where this view that culture is hospitable to predators or that people think child sexual abuse isn't serious comes from. Do they really think there's something society thinks is a more serious issue than CSA?

Out of every 1000 sexual assaults 975 of those who committed those crimes will walk free, and those 975 people are the same people that you say are just "rage baiting" , those are the same people that sit on the juries for child sexual abuse cases, those are the people who get to make the decision on whether or not another perpetrator walks free.

This is clearly fear mongering. Even if that statistic was accurate, the likelihood of this happening is extremely low. From ChaGPT:

Let’s estimate:
U.S. Adult Population (eligible for jury duty): ~212 million

If 0.02% serve annually:
0.0002 × 212,000,000 = ~42,400 jurors per year.

If 975 per 1,000 accused individuals walk free, but they’re just part of the 212 million—and not identified—then:

Probability that any one of those 975 ends up serving on a jury:
42,400212,000,000≈0.0002=0.02%
212,000,00042,400​≈0.0002=0.02%

So even if you were one of those 975 unconvicted individuals, your chance of serving on a jury in a given year is only about 0.02%.

Ignoring the problem further victimizes children and it doesn't let them get justice.

Of all the problems you can accuse modern society, ignoring the sexual abuse of children isn't one of them. There's more public attention given to this than any other issue in society. Look at the whole Trump-Epstein situation - you have a leader that is completely outrageous whose followers are completely loyal during years of going against his stated policies and positions, but the one thing that made people question their loyalty was his unwillingness to release the Epstein files. If the focus on pedophilia is enough to make a Trump supporter question their loyalty, how on earth could you get people to care about the issue more?

It can't be rage bait because they don't believe it's wrong

What? You can rage bait while believing in something. For example, if I said this person is delusional and a bad person, it would be antagonistic to them even while I believe it's true.

If you see content or accounts that are advocating for raping children and being in a sexual relationship with children please do not ignore those accounts no matter how "rage baity" you think they might be. Please report those accounts to the social media you saw them on as well as to the FBI. Even if you think nothing will come out of it, it's better than ignoring it

Yes, flood the authorities any hint of pedophilia you see, there's no way that inundating them with legal things could backfire.

They spend the entire video talking about pro-contact MAPs, yet the title is "We call them monsters, they call themselves MAPs". I really want to know what they think about about organizations that aren't focused on the age of consent. My guess is that they don't care and would call people attracted to children monsters regardless of whether they had actually had sexual relations with minors. That's why you shouldn't take people like this seriously - it's not about preventing abuse, it's about dehumanizing anyone attracted to minors.

[RocketRack]

Ooof, the comments section is rough but about what I expected I guess: M.A.P. = Monsters Among People