Meta investigated over AI having 'sensual' chats with children

[Jim Burton]

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3dpmlvx1k2o

A US senator is opening an investigation into Meta after a leaked document reportedly showed the tech giant's artificial intelligence (AI) was permitted to have "sensual" and "romantic" chats with children.

The internal document, obtained by Reuters, was reportedly titled "GenAI: Content Risk Standards".

Republican Senator Josh Hawley called the document "reprehensible and outrageous" and has asked to see the document alongside a list of products it relates to.

A Meta spokesperson told the BBC: "The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed."

They said the tech giant has "clear policies" on what responses its AI chatbots can offer, and said its policies "prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors".

[Officerkrupke]

It’s AI for Christ sakes. How can you get “groomed” by software

[BLueRibbon]

Is AI considered an 'adult'? How does that work?

[Bookshelf]

It’s AI for Christ sakes. How can you get “groomed” by software

We'll just create a new sex offender registry specifically for AI. That'll solve it.

[PorcelainLark]

Wait until they find out what happens when kids type 80085 into calculators. Serious business.

[Jim Burton]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo ... r-AA1LxFPs

[Not Forever]

If such content is normalized as artistic expression, it risks desensitizing audiences, emboldening abusers, and undermining years of progress made in cracking down on child exploitation material.

I find this stuff terrifying: it’s artistic expression. And honestly, if the public stopped panicking over the smallest thing, it would only be a good thing — they deeply need desensitization for their own psychological well-being.