The stastic that non pedos fuck more children than pedos?

[G@yWad69]

Have yall seen the stastic that non pedos fuck more children than pedos? That doesnt even make any fucking sense. Thats like straight men fucking more men than gay men. Theres got to be something that they are leaving out. Like maybe they are using a strict definition of pedophillia(only children who havent started puberty), and a broad definition of child(anyone under 18). If you leave out hebes and ephebes fucking kids but classify anyone under 18 as a kid then technically that makes sense, but also it doesnt? Why would they leave out hebephiles and ephobphiles and only include pedophiles. They need to redo those studies and include hebes and ephebes instead of arbritrarily exluding them. And if they are actually using a broad definition of pedophile(anyone over 18 into anyone under 18), that is so confusing and makes no sense?? Non pedos fuck more children than pedos?? Thats actually insane. Yet still, antis blame all the child fucking on pedos and single us out despite the fact that their kid is more likely to get a blowjob from a non pedo than a pedo??!

[Jim Burton]

The number of pedophiles is quite small, around 1-4% of the male population.

Proportionally, there are more pedophiles among CSOs.

[SCM123ABC]

Have yall seen the stastic that non pedos fuck more children than pedos? That doesnt even make any fucking sense. Thats like straight men fucking more men than gay men. Theres got to be something that they are leaving out. Like maybe they are using a strict definition of pedophillia(only children who havent started puberty), and a broad definition of child(anyone under 18). If you leave out hebes and ephebes fucking kids but classify anyone under 18 as a kid then technically that makes sense, but also it doesnt? Why would they leave out hebephiles and ephobphiles and only include pedophiles. They need to redo those studies and include hebes and ephebes instead of arbritrarily exluding them. And if they are actually using a broad definition of pedophile(anyone over 18 into anyone under 18), that is so confusing and makes no sense?? Non pedos fuck more children than pedos?? Thats actually insane. Yet still, antis blame all the child fucking on pedos and single us out despite the fact that their kid is more likely to get a blowjob from a non pedo than a pedo??!

It's true also pardon me for my rudeness but I just had a question why are you complaining that stat helps us?

[SCM123ABC]

The number of pedophiles is quite small, around 1-4% of the male population.

Proportionally, there are more pedophiles among CSOs.

This is completely right

[Curson]

Have yall seen the stastic that non pedos fuck more children than pedos? That doesnt even make any fucking sense. Thats like straight men fucking more men than gay men. Theres got to be something that they are leaving out. Like maybe they are using a strict definition of pedophillia(only children who havent started puberty), and a broad definition of child(anyone under 18). If you leave out hebes and ephebes fucking kids but classify anyone under 18 as a kid then technically that makes sense, but also it doesnt? Why would they leave out hebephiles and ephobphiles and only include pedophiles. They need to redo those studies and include hebes and ephebes instead of arbritrarily exluding them. And if they are actually using a broad definition of pedophile(anyone over 18 into anyone under 18), that is so confusing and makes no sense?? Non pedos fuck more children than pedos?? Thats actually insane. Yet still, antis blame all the child fucking on pedos and single us out despite the fact that their kid is more likely to get a blowjob from a non pedo than a pedo??!

It doesn't really make any sense at all for people to use the word pedo incorrectly they way they do... but does anything really make sense? If that was the case, they would focus on those that take advantage of kids instead of "pedos" that want to build relationships with them.

[JGHeaven]

It does make sense to me.

Most people are law abiding citizens, including pedophiles.
What these stats are built around are people who break the law and abuse kids, and so what drives people to do that?
It tends to be people with low levels of self control often combined with an additional factor such as lack of empathy for others or a power complex where they derive satisfaction from dominating or controlling others. The bully mentality where the joy for the bully comes from seeing the other person afraid and being able to dominate them.

None of this is about sexuality so far, it's about self control and deriving joy from intimidating or dominating others with low levels of empathy.

So this person will look for an easy outlet, often a women they can abuse but children are even easier targets. So such people will turn towards children (and women) because they're easy to dominate and exploit through sexual and other violence.

These people could be any sexuality, sex is a weapon but it isn't what is giving pleasure, it's the fear and the feeling of being dominant, alpha, king that is giving pleasure, seeing the other person used and afraid.

Since pedophiles are a minority then it follows that a minority of such people would be pedophiles. Most such abuse should be expected from non-pedophiles. Actually pedophiles, being more aware of children and closer in terms of friendship and care are more likely to become aware of such abusive situations and help children out of them.

[Officerkrupke]

It does make sense to me.

Most people are law abiding citizens, including pedophiles.
What these stats are built around are people who break the law and abuse kids, and so what drives people to do that?
It tends to be people with low levels of self control often combined with an additional factor such as lack of empathy for others or a power complex where they derive satisfaction from dominating or controlling others. The bully mentality where the joy for the bully comes from seeing the other person afraid and being able to dominate them.

None of this is about sexuality so far, it's about self control and deriving joy from intimidating or dominating others with low levels of empathy.

So this person will look for an easy outlet, often a women they can abuse but children are even easier targets. So such people will turn towards children (and women) because they're easy to dominate and exploit through sexual and other violence.

These people could be any sexuality, sex is a weapon but it isn't what is giving pleasure, it's the fear and the feeling of being dominant, alpha, king that is giving pleasure, seeing the other person used and afraid.
of them.

I also think this is where the idea of “power and control” wrt pedophilia comes about. Basically, contact-based child sex offenders who are non-preferential.

[mrlolicon93]

OP the vast majority of child molesters are not pedophiles nor minor attracted in general.

You don't have to be attracted to kids to fuck them most molesters fuck kids not because they are attracted to them but because they have other motivations/issues such as stress mental health issues or wanting control and power over a vulnerable individual.

Most sex offenders and child molesters prefer adults but use children as sexual surrogates which you also, see in prison with heterosexual men engaging in gay sex they aren't actually gay they are just engaging in gay sex because there are no women available but i bet you if there were they would choose the women over the other man because that is their orientation/preference.

Most maps are non-offending but most people still refuse to separate pedophile and child abuser.