All men being pedos wouldnt even be a problem. But 1.Its not true, pedos only make up 1-3% of the population, and men make up 50%. And 2.They dont see pedophillia as a neutural or good thing, they see it as a mark of satan that makes you the devil reincarnateKylelomaz wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 4:41 am Feminism is the most stupidest thing to have come out of the 20th century men and women are deferent on many fundamental things.
And is part of the reason why pedophillia is hated and detested.
The hatred really only started come out when the feminist of the 60s and 70s gain momentum.
And now a days all men are basically pedophiles to them.
Why I dont support femminism as an AFAB/Transman
Re: Why I dont support femminism as an AFAB/Transman
0-11 year old boys and girls rock ma world
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2025 5:25 am
Re: Why I dont support femminism as an AFAB/Transman
shaming women for having sexual autonomy is repressive misogyny. allowing women to dress however they want, have sex with whoever they want, or not have sex at all if that's what they want, is giving them choice. enabling women to choose these things for themselves is empowering. enabling people to choose how to use their own body is a core part of liberation, and thus enabling women to make choices about themselves is feminist liberation.G@yWad69 wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:55 pmYeah, women. Not men, not children. Just women and women only. And now they have done a completely 180. And are shaming one for being sexual/having sexual autonomy and seeing that women having a sexuality is a part of “the patriarchy” and is “objectification/sexualization”. Any time I see a woman dare to be sexual, either online or in person. There is always at least a couple of femminists in the comments “why are you sexulazing yourself? You are appealing to the male gaze/the patriarchy and are setting femminist back” god forbid a woman want to wear a cute miniskirt and a bralet?? Maybe she is being sexy not because of “the patriarchy” or the “male gaze” but brcause she is an autonomous human being with a sexuality. Femminists are any enemy of sex and sexual freedom. All of histroy points to this, and the only exception I see was that tiny blip in the 60-70s with the birth control. A broken clock can be right twice a day, doesnt mean its not brokenironic_clarity wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 6:26 am OP's obsession with genitals betrays bioessentialist thought, which is disappointing coming from a trans person. i guess if it lets you proclaim women as the reason for your oppression, that is more valuable than not misgendering yourself?
i think you find feminism confusing because the mainstream feminist thought fails to accommodate trans people, and extrapolate from there.
no philosophy is one singular dogma. isn't it worth considering that feminism enabled sexual liberation through contraception? who do you think motivated the development of the birth control pill? what do you think they wanted to achieve by making that accessible to women? do you think the world is a better or worse place because of it?
Re: Why I dont support femminism as an AFAB/Transman
Ok well ur definition of femminist liberation is the complete opposite of mainstream femminist liberation. Because to most modern day western femminists, dhaming women for their sexual autonomy, shaming them for how the dress and shaming them for who they sleep with, is “liberation” because in their view, they are “liberating” women from the male gaze and the patriarchy and “sExUlIzAtIoN” and “ObJecTifIcaTiOn”ironic_clarity wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 10:48 pmshaming women for having sexual autonomy is repressive misogyny. allowing women to dress however they want, have sex with whoever they want, or not have sex at all if that's what they want, is giving them choice. enabling women to choose these things for themselves is empowering. enabling people to choose how to use their own body is a core part of liberation, and thus enabling women to make choices about themselves is feminist liberation.G@yWad69 wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:55 pmironic_clarity wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 6:26 am OP's obsession with genitals betrays bioessentialist thought, which is disappointing coming from a trans person. i guess if it lets you proclaim women as the reason for your oppression, that is more valuable than not misgendering yourself?
i think you find feminism confusing because the mainstream feminist thought fails to accommodate trans people, and extrapolate from there.
no philosophy is one singular dogma. isn't it worth considering that feminism enabled sexual liberation through contraception? who do you think motivated the development of the birth control pill? what do you think they wanted to achieve by making that accessible to women? do you think the world is a better or worse place because of it?
Yeah, women. Not men, not children. Just women and women only. And now they have done a completely 180. And are shaming one for being sexual/having sexual autonomy and seeing that women having a sexuality is a part of “the patriarchy” and is “objectification/sexualization”. Any time I see a woman dare to be sexual, either online or in person. There is always at least a couple of femminists in the comments “why are you sexulazing yourself? You are appealing to the male gaze/the patriarchy and are setting femminist back” god forbid a woman want to wear a cute miniskirt and a bralet?? Maybe she is being sexy not because of “the patriarchy” or the “male gaze” but brcause she is an autonomous human being with a sexuality. Femminists are any enemy of sex and sexual freedom. All of histroy points to this, and the only exception I see was that tiny blip in the 60-70s with the birth control. A broken clock can be right twice a day, doesnt mean its not broken
0-11 year old boys and girls rock ma world
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2025 5:25 am
Re: Why I dont support femminism as an AFAB/Transman
you say a lot about what feminism is for someone who doesn't seem to have read the word very many times.G@yWad69 wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 1:21 pm Ok well ur definition of femminist liberation is the complete opposite of mainstream femminist liberation. Because to most modern day western femminists, dhaming women for their sexual autonomy, shaming them for how the dress and shaming them for who they sleep with, is “liberation” because in their view, they are “liberating” women from the male gaze and the patriarchy and “sExUlIzAtIoN” and “ObJecTifIcaTiOn”
this makes me curious to ask plainly: do you actually think womens sexual freedom and autonomy is a good thing? do you think women being able to decide what they want for themselves and their bodies on their own?