An interesting post on pedophilia

[mrlolicon93]

I don't like the term "acting predatory" being used that way though, but do I think the overall point is correct.

It is correct that people like myself cannot openly talk about how much I love little girls to people like how most dudes can with chicks they find online or in-person. My only social release is lolicon and its communities, until my place of residence decides it's also illegal and "abusive". I would not say lolicon "stops me" from offending, that'd be my moral compass, but it does help keep me in a normal state of mind. Being unsatisfied sexually builds up over time and that leads to further problems down the road, so forcing MAPs to "hold it in or else" is not a solution.

The internet is not a welcoming place for us but I will not be intimidated by those who try to take it away from us.

I agree with their last few points on the punishment not fitting the crime, child-like sex dolls, AI child pornography, and free, private, therapy to help someone accept it as part of them and not see it as a huge issue. I have nearly lost MAP friends to suicide because of the insane fear and paranoia behind having their life ruined for something they didn't get a choice in. If people just understood that we are human too, that would go a long way.

Perhaps that was a misuse of words and i apologize.

[BLueRibbon]

The irony is, and this bothers me, that you can find autopsy photos of people online or pictures of dead bodies that their loved ones have to deal with being available to the general public, you can even post a video of a man being murdered but to film the statutory (or legitimate) rape of a child carries a special legal status. I can understand the idea behind criminalizing actual child porn because that can affect children or even the distribution/sharing of it as a privacy matter (even if it's consensual, maybe as an adult the child would change their mind about wanting it available to the public) but none of that applies to simulated child porn.

It reminds me of something I thought about recently. I heard an advertisement on the radio for a mobile network or something, where a parent was wondering if their friend— another parent— would have the coverage to livestream a birth. I thought that was an odd thing to joke about; so I looked around to see if that's something people actually do. It is. There are entire social media pages dedicated to it, and people document even the more private moments of it for their family and friends to watch for some reason.

This is in a country where you can be arrested for being in possession of a drawn image of a naked child. You can watch a real life naked child come out of a gaping hole on a livestream, a traumatic private first moment in a child's life, without ever questioning the ability for the child to consent to complete strangers watching it— all while if you open up another tab with an anime kid's penis, you'll get the door kicked in for... violating a fictional kid's consent or something.

Stupid world.

This is because a livestream of a birth is something a 'normal' woman might want to watch.

Meanwhile, shotacon is something in which only a 'deviant' would be interested.

The deviancy is the offensive part. The 'child protection' argument is a lie everyone tells themselves to avoid having to admit that they want someone locked up for their feelings.