Complaint thread on moderation norms, split from Nepios (GD)

[Cunny Defender]

I'll just like to add that i completely disagree with the forum rules, but i do understand that they probably exist for legal reasons. However, i still don't believe the rules need to be so tough, even in a legal setting

[Jim Burton]

What rules do you refer to? The present rules have been developed and agreed upon by the mod group following over a year of stress-tests.

Admittedly, we have not faced any legal issues, host issues or server seizure thusfar, but that probably owes more to the moderation-grounded ethic of this forum than anything else.

[Cunny Defender]

Why?

I don't get an attraction to infants, but it's not like nepis are here pissing in my coffee.

But by the way nepis, if you ever do come and piss in my coffee, we're going to have a problem, OK?

If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all

Nepis would probably tell you that they're not looking to impose any kind of adult sexuality on extremely young children.

And let's take your claim of 'no capacity' at face value. That doesn't mean they're 'degenerates', nor does it mean they should be forced to hide.

You're drawing the line right behind your own feet. Not cool.

G@yWad69 called me and himself "degenerates," so i don't know about that. Then Jim Burton censored my reply to him, which is definitely not cool

[BLueRibbon]

If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all

Nepis would probably tell you that they're not looking to impose any kind of adult sexuality on extremely young children.

And let's take your claim of 'no capacity' at face value. That doesn't mean they're 'degenerates', nor does it mean they should be forced to hide.

You're drawing the line right behind your own feet. Not cool.

G@yWad69 called me and himself "degenerates," so i don't know about that. Then Jim Burton censored my reply to him, which is definitely not cool

Just make some effort to be a bit nicer...

This board isn't going to censor you for your opinions, but try not to be a dick.

[Cunny Defender]

Nepis would probably tell you that they're not looking to impose any kind of adult sexuality on extremely young children.

And let's take your claim of 'no capacity' at face value. That doesn't mean they're 'degenerates', nor does it mean they should be forced to hide.

You're drawing the line right behind your own feet. Not cool.

G@yWad69 called me and himself "degenerates," so i don't know about that. Then Jim Burton censored my reply to him, which is definitely not cool

Just make some effort to be a bit nicer...

This board isn't going to censor you for your opinions, but try not to be a dick.

You can look at our conversation, and i was definitely not the one being a dick

[Jim Burton]

I split this thread, as users shouldn't resort to complaining in-thread, as it poisons the atmosphere. Either report violating content, or address general complaints in this part of the forum.

Speaking personally, I think it would help if Cunny Defender looked at their contribution to discussion from the perspective of others as well as their own.