Do you prefer 'pure' or provocative boys/girls?

[BLueRibbon]

One of my favorite boys at work is such a little tease.

One thing he likes to do is give friends a peek at his underwear. Yesterday, when we were figuring out teams for a sports game, he insisted that he should be on a certain team because of the color of his underwear. He pulled the front of his pants forward to show us all.

Now, I'll admit I have kind of a crush on him anyway. He has a beautiful face and a super cute little butt. But him being such a 'perv' on top drives me wild.

What do you prefer, 'pure' kids or provocative kids?

[JGHeaven]

Provocative every time. Pure is nice but when someone is flirting and clearly has a naughty side, that's next level.

[jbear]

One of my favorite boys at work is such a little tease.

One thing he likes to do is give friends a peek at his underwear. Yesterday, when we were figuring out teams for a sports game, he insisted that he should be on a certain team because of the color of his underwear. He pulled the front of his pants forward to show us all.

Now, I'll admit I have kind of a crush on him anyway. He has a beautiful face and a super cute little butt. But him being such a 'perv' on top drives me wild.

What do you prefer, 'pure' kids or provocative kids?

that sounds hot af..boxers or briefs? I prefer provocative kids too...makes them more interesting and fun.

[FairBlueLove]

Both attractive to me, for different reasons.

[xeon]

In most cases I would prefer a more 'pure' boy/child because that's closer to the childish innocence that I am attracted to, but it would depend on the context and/or what it is they are doing. Provocative could also be attractive to me, but it would have to be in way that still portrays the kid in a cute childish way.

[BLueRibbon]

One of my favorite boys at work is such a little tease.

One thing he likes to do is give friends a peek at his underwear. Yesterday, when we were figuring out teams for a sports game, he insisted that he should be on a certain team because of the color of his underwear. He pulled the front of his pants forward to show us all.

Now, I'll admit I have kind of a crush on him anyway. He has a beautiful face and a super cute little butt. But him being such a 'perv' on top drives me wild.

What do you prefer, 'pure' kids or provocative kids?

that sounds hot af..boxers or briefs? I prefer provocative kids too...makes them more interesting and fun.

We didn't see enough to tell whether they were boxers or briefs. We only got a glimpse!

[Learning to undeny]

I love it when boys do unexpected things. Like improvising, showing confidence. But "pure" is fine as long as it doesn't mean "dull".

[Binepi]

I think both are hot, but with boys am very focused around arousal. Whether or not they understand it and are openly horny or flirty, or are embarrassed or overwhelmed. Both are hot.

Girls I go pretty hard into innocent specifically though

[Kierkegaard]

I'm not attracted to "innocence" at all. I like intelligent, precocious boys the most.

The modern ideal of the innocent, pure, naive child is a harmful social construct. Sex shouldn't be seen as a corrupting influence which children need to be shielded from. If anything I find this kind of artificially imposed innocence to be annoying and distasteful. Pedos who are into this kind of thing seem more like they have a fetish for the idea of the child than an actual sexual orientation towards children. Same as people with a trans sissy fetish or racial fetishes. It's off-putting when I read BL erotica and it centers on despoiling a clueless child who doesn't know what a penis is or whatever.

I'm not a childhood fetishist. I don't have a paraphilia for "innocence" or whatever. I have a sexual and romantic orientation towards boys. Actual boys, not the ideal or stereotype of a boy.

[BLueRibbon]

I'm not attracted to "innocence" at all. I like intelligent, precocious boys the most.

The modern ideal of the innocent, pure, naive child is a harmful social construct. Sex shouldn't be seen as a corrupting influence which children need to be shielded from. If anything I find this kind of artificially imposed innocence to be annoying and distasteful. Pedos who are into this kind of thing seem more like they have a fetish for the idea of the child than an actual sexual orientation towards children. Same as people with a trans sissy fetish or racial fetishes. It's off-putting when I read BL erotica and it centers on despoiling a clueless child who doesn't know what a penis is or whatever.

I'm not a childhood fetishist. I don't have a paraphilia for "innocence" or whatever. I have a sexual and romantic orientation towards boys. Actual boys, not the ideal or stereotype of a boy.

Great response.