In the United Kingdom, newly released data show that prosecutions for real child sexual abuse images have fallen by more than half since 2017, even as cases involving purely fictional or AI-generated material have surged to nearly 40% of all image offences. Other countries, like Australia, don’t even distinguish between the two categories—hiding the same pattern in their official statistics. The result is clear: resources are being diverted away from protecting real children, and toward punishing thought and imagination.
So you could say that there's less real cp and so less abuse as a result of AI cp, but the drive is to compact AI cp and return to an increase of real cp.
CantChainTheSpirit wrote: Sun Dec 14, 2025 1:09 pm
So you could say that there's less real cp and so less abuse as a result of AI cp, but the drive is to compact AI cp and return to an increase of real cp.
The IWF, who are driving AI hysteria in the UK, would like that. They need 'bad things' to happen to sustain their funding.
CantChainTheSpirit wrote: Sun Dec 14, 2025 1:09 pm
So you could say that there's less real cp and so less abuse as a result of AI cp, but the drive is to compact AI cp and return to an increase of real cp.
The IWF, who are driving AI hysteria in the UK, would like that. They need 'bad things' to happen to sustain their funding.
That does seem to be the case if you follow the logic.
It's like if heroine addition was out of control and methadone was found to be effective in combating heroine addiction then you would start to allow methadone use. Of course a drug cartel wouldn't want that since their business is selling heroine. Here, AI cp has been found to reduce addiction to real cp and to reduce the market for real cp, so AI cp would seem to be a valuable tool, unless the aim is to prop up the real cp market.
