BLueRibbon wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 10:03 am
One of your stories could have been interpreted as admitting to potentially criminalized behavior. It is possible that we misinterpreted your comment, but it's quite hard to follow your rapid fire stream-of-consciousness posting. Please take a step back, and post slowly, thinking through whether or not people will be able to follow what you have to say.
And no, we don't need to see photos of you at any age.
Wtf plz tell me which one? Plz don't report me okay plz? I haven't done anything wrong
I'm literally panicking right now plz tell me I didn't do anything wrong what's happening plz tell me
I'm 19, a Christian, and from California (though I'm hoping to move to Georgia by next decade)
Non offending pedophile/MAP (attracted to little girls age 6-10)
Pedophilia is simply a broader age-spectrum of sexual attraction that for some people expresses itself as a preference.
Nor is it an "orientation" as this word represents the idea of polarity, the coexistence of opposites, which in sexuality there are two: hetero and homo. Age preference does not equal orientation.
We like what we like and that is that.
My core preferences solidified themselves in early childhood, fully crystalizing in my early teens, and this is how it is for most. Very rarely do we discover new sexual interests in adulthood.
I would not choose to not be attracted to pubescent preteens/teens or young women if I could but I would choose to be attracted to middle-aged and elderly women. It would be great if I could choose to be attracted to women who aren't my type physically in general (it would be a huge advantage for me but in some bizarro world where a woman was attracted to me when I wasn't attracted to her, I would want her to benefit from having an intimate relationship with me as well even if I had other options. I truly wish that unrequited attraction did not exist).
If I chose to not be attracted to someone I am attracted to it would be because of their personality (i.e. their being cruel, sadistic, callous or inconsiderate; basically someone who doesn't value the happiness of others). It's inconvenient to be wired in a way that makes someone a potential source of both happiness and stress for you (so the stress you feel toward their personality blocks the felt natural attraction and the pleasure you could feel from intimacy with them which is a problem because that has the effect of desensitizing you to the physical traits they share with more likable people that make them both sexually attractive).
SCM123ABC wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:45 pm
Just wondering? Me probably yeah but then again something's were special so yeah.
I think I maybe would, if it was reversible it would be an absolute yes, I'm even thinking ab going to therapy and such. It's not because I think it's immoral or smth like that, but because I don't wanna end up in prison, tbh, and I think that in a few years when I'm legally an adult, if a teen wanted to have something w me, idk if I'd have the willpower to deny myself. So yeah I would do it just for self control and bc well, revolution can't happen behind prison bars (lol)
"Before a revolution happens, it is perceived as impossible; after it happens, it is seen as having been inevitable."
-Rosa Luxemburg
I love that side of who I am. It took many years to learn to love it but I did and now I consider it being responsible for many of the personal qualities I admire most. If I wasn't a map I think I'd be a worse person overall.
Keep every stone they throw at you. You've got castles to build.
“Hope is not something you find; it’s something you create.” – Cassian Andor
“Our fight is for those who came before us, and for those still to come.” – Mon Mothma
