Predictions for the future based on current events

A place to talk about Minor-Attracted People and MAP/AAM-related issues.
Post Reply
G@yWad69

Predictions for the future based on current events

Post by G@yWad69 »

1.Accusations of pedophillia will become even more ridiculous and unrelating to the actual defintion.-People are called pedophiles at the drop of a hat nowadays, dating a 17 year old at 18 is pedo, dating a short woman as a tall man is pedo, dressing in lolita fashion is pedo, telling someone they are using pedo wrong is pedo. The accusations will somehow become even more frequent, more false, and more ridiculous than they were before, which leads to my next point

2.Teens and preteens and even cute little kids will be accusing adults and other minors of being pedos even more frequently. Its already happining. Minor teens barging into 18+ spaces and claiming they are “groomed”. Pre teens starting arguments with adults and using words wrong then pulling the minor card last minute to claim you are “grooming” them. Minor teens saying that adults complimenting them is harassment. Barely legal teens being accused of being pedos for dating someone a couple months younger than them. Minor teens saying that barely legal teens and young 20 year olds are “grooming and abuse victims” for legally dating older men. The amount of accusations of “pdfillia” or “kiddy liking” will skyrocket. Not because genuine cases of child sex offending or minor attraction or going up, but because these terms have been so watered down by attention seeking whores on tiktok that dating a grown women under 5’8 is now “sus” because they are “minor coded”

3.Minors will be even more infantilized. Ive seen people saying that 15 year olds shouldnt be arrested for LITERAL MURDER because they dont understand the concept of murder, not to blame 16 year olds for drinking/texting and driving and fucking killing people because their “brains are underdevloped”, that 18 year olds in college not being able to do basic fucking life skills to survive like cooking an egg or doing their laundry is “normal” because they are “basically children”, that 25 year old women cant consent to 40+ year old men because they are “literal children”. The infantilization will become even more insane

4.Surveillance will increase. You reap what you sow teenagers ;). Teenagers will be put under ibcreasing survillence and get less privilleges since they want to claim that they are “grooming victims” of “literal pdfs” 24/7 and want to get out of basic accountabillity for their actions so bad. The age for social media will be raised to 18+, a logical consequnece for the minor teens and preteens barging into 18+ spaces to falsely accuse everyone of every age of “literal pdfillia” and “grooming” for making a sex joke or writing a spicy fanfic. Phones will be banned at school and will be bought for kids at later ages to prevent “grooming”. Child parental locks will be used at older ages, at even 16 and 17 since these “lItErAl ChIlDrEn” claim to be groomed and innocent little baby victims all the damn time. Dear 12-17 year olds, if you want to act like innocent little baby children perma victims all the damn time, your gonna be treated like onnocent little baby perma victims. Cant pull the “iM lItErALly A MiNor” card online if you arent allowed online in the first place :).

5.Preteens and Teens will be increasingly frustrated for dealing with the consequences of their attention seeking whore behavior and will act out, start fighting against infantilization and finally stop calling themselves children once they realize how limited actual children are treated.

6. The general public and people who work with minors will become increasingly frustrated at the infantilization of teens and preteens and even my gorgeous little babies(children), they will become increasingly aggravated by the bad behavior, lack of attention spans, and attention seeking from gen alpha. Their will also be the constant false accusations of “pdfillia” over trivial shit to male teachers, which could lead to men loosing their jobs, being beaten, tortured, killed, or imprisoned. Less men will want to work in childcare and less people, male or female will want to work in childcare overall. Ironically this will cause more MAPs to work in childcare, as we are the only people with a genuine interest in minors strong enough that we are willing to take the constant harassment, screaming, and attention seeking whore accusations in order to have the privilege of working with baddies in our AoA.

7.Their will be less childbirths/people starting families. Less and less men want to/will want to become fathers with the increasing demonization of men from women and minors. I saw a father get called a pdf for holding his daughter, I saw a man get called a pdf for kissing his daughter on the cheek, I saw a man get called a pdf for not wanting to change his daughters shitty diapers. No matter what men do, even if they are literal fathers, they cant escape the demonization and pedo accusations from women and minors. Less and less men will be willingly to start a family, at least with women, and less and less men will show affection and care to their children, at least to their daughters.

8.Women will want less kids too, the entirety of the burden of raising a child will be placed on women, since men will be too demonized to be allowed near children, so women will have to do all the work. The work that is steadily increasing with the infantilization of older and even older ages. A woman got arrested recently for letting her preteen son walk home from school on a familiar route in broad daylight. With ridiculous draconian child rearing rules like that having kids wont be worth it with the constant threat of social shame or imprisonment. It takes two to raise most kids, espcially with such ridiculous rules as modern times

9.Actual children, not “lItErAL ChIlDrEn”(underaged teens and preteens) will become more mature as “LitErAl ChIlDrEn” become more infantile. We are already seeing this. Actual children wearing sephora, crop tops, booty shorts, body skim dresses, making tiktoks, going to parties and other things more commonly associated with sterotypical teenagers, while “LitErAl ChiLReN” are whining about having basic responisbillities and accountability, dressing like nuns, refusing to go to parties, and other things stereotypically associated with actual children. The sterotypical roles of children and teens have basically swapped places and will continue to swap places as children crave more and more to break boundraries and gain respect from adults and teenagers crave more and more to be treated like infants and avoid accountability.

10. Pedophillia is becoming more normalized as antis normalize pedophillia. Any time the word “pdfilia” or “p3d0ph1l1@“ or “kiddy liking” or “nonce” or any variation is used for anything other then a 16+ having a primary or exclusive attraction to prepubsecent children then pedophillia is being normalized. The gross overuse of the word and constant stupid accusations makes it seem like pedophillia is everywhere and everyone is secrety a pedophile. Which seems annoying at first, but actually helps our cause, if everyone is a pdf, no one is a pdf. It makes minor attraction a more normal and common thing, and not a deviant attraction only few possess, it makes accusations less serious, since once again, if everyone is a literal kiddy toucher no one is a kiddy toucher. It will drive more people who are fed up with the strict social rules to join the MAP cause and make MAPs more visible. Pedophiles only make up 1-3% of the population, and those are hardly fighting numbers, but if mundane ass shit like liking age play, dating short legal adult women, and correcting people for using the word “pedophile” wrong makes you as much of a “pdf” as someone who jacks of to 3 year olds, then it bolsters our numbers from 1-3% to 75% or more, and non pdfs will be the weird and deviant ones.

11.Pedophillia will be seen more as “mental health” issue, which I fundamentally disagree with. I would rather be seen as a kinky deviant pervert than someone whos sick on the level of those who see shadow people telling them their god. It also leads to “justifications” of us being improsined for longer than our sentences, often times indefinitely, due to us being “mentally unfit” to enter society. More people will want research on us nonces to “protect” their kids from the evil sin of sexuality and the only way to get “research” on us is to label us as “ill” so you get more funding from the goverment. More anti Cs /pedmeds will arise due to this. More liberals will defend our humanity to seem “woke” about “mental health”, which is good I guess, but very patronizing. We arent mentally ill because we like cunny. People will also be increasingly more sympathetic to pedos the more draconian social and legal rules get(a 17 and 364 day old sending a willing nude makes a 18 year old get the death penalty for “pdfillia” a 17 year old dating a 15 year old gets harrased and beat up and bullied for “grooming”, a 30 year old will get harrassed and beaten up for being platonically affectionate towards their daughter). People will get more sympathetic towards actual pdfs and those labled as pdfs by attention seekers, put of genuine human empathy and also the genuine fear that they could be next

12.More pro Cs as well as anti Cs, as more MAPs will question why sex is so inherently evil and dangerous to kids in the first place, and why beating the ever loving shit out of a small child is perfectly socially acceptable, but giving a willing and informed child a pleasurable orgasm makes you worse than satan himself

13.More MAPs being honest in general, due to the normilazation of pedophillia, ironically done by antis, more people will start identifying as MAPs. I am seeing this on tiktok because my fyp is filled with brats💢😭(tiktok nows what I like) and I see comments with the MAP flag, the girl and boyliving flag and symbol, the 🗺️ emoji, and people unironically reffering to real kids as cunny.
User avatar
PorcelainLark
Posts: 921
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm

Re: Predictions for the future based on current events

Post by PorcelainLark »

What does "pedmeds" mean?
InuYasha
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:23 am

Re: Predictions for the future based on current events

Post by InuYasha »

This is a process that is already unfolding before our eyes. So-called "developed" countries are banning teenagers from using social media. In fact, the current pedo-hysteria is so absurd in its essence that it is itself self-defeating. The Third Moral Panic, which began in 1977 (according to Jenkins and Sonnenschein's observations) and has intensified every year since, has reached the point where it is affecting a huge number of people. The simple stigmatization of the "true pedophile" (a person who, as an adult or adolescent, experiences a predominant attraction to pre-pubescent individuals) could continue for a very long time, but the expansion first to hebephiles and then to teleophiles ("straight"), who date people younger or older than themselves (adults), significantly increases the number of victims of discrimination. And completely irrational concepts such as "grooming" (literal mind control and personality modification of the "victim") only accelerate the process. Ultimately, over the next 20-25 years, I expect the following: first, the authorities will tighten the screws as much as possible, establishing, if not a literal 1984, then a highly repressive society. Then, as the children of the current Generation Z (apparently, Generation Beta), coming of age, will fiercely resist these laws, amid the economic and social collapse that engulfs the system, based on pedo-hysteria and ageism, called "developed-country society." The real future overthrowers of this witch hunt are today's infants and those yet to be born. The process will be comparable to the end of the Second Moral Panic around 1960, but more significant.
bnkywuv
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2026 2:54 am

Re: Predictions for the future based on current events

Post by bnkywuv »

I had a minor on an art site I used to post my artwork on harass me because I said I believe children can be capable of consent (and should be, at least some cases).

I hate how we treat kids as these precious, fragile little "things" instead of humans and sentient beings. He claimed that I was advocating abuse and how no children could ever consent because "adults have so much coercive power" over them, ranting on and on about "power dynamics", "stating the facts", and "I cAnNoT CoNsEnT because I'm a MiNoR!!!". Accusing me that I had been "trying to abuse him" just by stating my desire for minors to have more freedom, autonomy, and be treated respectfully instead of like tools that have to do whatever the adults around them tell them to.

Personally as an adult who is an insane pushover when it comes to temperamental kids (even getting downright terrified at times), I swear he must have figured this out and found me an unsuspecting target. I deleted my account a few days later.

When I look to societies where children are granted more rights and autonomy, I don't see this being the case. Minors (what we would see as minors) are fully able to consent without coercive control by adults. They're generally much happier. Yes, assaulting a minor is forbidden unlike the antis say. There's a HUGE difference between assault and loving, understanding education and practice for later in life.

"Oh but kids are happy in our society!" Some might say. Look at the high rates of adolescent drug use, drinking, and suicides and tell me they're happy.

To add, the part about minors getting away with murder is really scary to me. How low will that go to? How about the fact that an adult (not even a MAP) finds a little girl's dress "cute" is now predatory? We aren't even allowed to show kids BASIC LOVE AND AFFECTION anymore which will only lead to more frustration among the youth and more violence, drug use, and suicides.

Yet this is what antis, even antiMAP minors preach at the top of their lungs. It's not just the adults freaking out over this. It's scary, really scary!
37, female. Writer, mediocre artist.
Pro-c, though has intrusive rape fantasies and nightmares involving minors.
AoA is usually 2 but can go younger, oldest AoA is around 12-14.
Can like adults if they appear young, but fades with time.
Into zoo too!
John_Doe
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2025 4:57 pm

Re: Predictions for the future based on current events

Post by John_Doe »

bnkywuv wrote: Thu Feb 05, 2026 4:39 am I had a minor on an art site I used to post my artwork on harass me because I said I believe children can be capable of consent (and should be, at least some cases).

I hate how we treat kids as these precious, fragile little "things" instead of humans and sentient beings. He claimed that I was advocating abuse and how no children could ever consent because "adults have so much coercive power" over them, ranting on and on about "power dynamics", "stating the facts", and "I cAnNoT CoNsEnT because I'm a MiNoR!!!". Accusing me that I had been "trying to abuse him" just by stating my desire for minors to have more freedom, autonomy, and be treated respectfully instead of like tools that have to do whatever the adults around them tell them to.

Personally as an adult who is an insane pushover when it comes to temperamental kids (even getting downright terrified at times), I swear he must have figured this out and found me an unsuspecting target. I deleted my account a few days later.

When I look to societies where children are granted more rights and autonomy, I don't see this being the case. Minors (what we would see as minors) are fully able to consent without coercive control by adults. They're generally much happier. Yes, assaulting a minor is forbidden unlike the antis say. There's a HUGE difference between assault and loving, understanding education and practice for later in life.

"Oh but kids are happy in our society!" Some might say. Look at the high rates of adolescent drug use, drinking, and suicides and tell me they're happy.

To add, the part about minors getting away with murder is really scary to me. How low will that go to? How about the fact that an adult (not even a MAP) finds a little girl's dress "cute" is now predatory? We aren't even allowed to show kids BASIC LOVE AND AFFECTION anymore which will only lead to more frustration among the youth and more violence, drug use, and suicides.

Yet this is what antis, even antiMAP minors preach at the top of their lungs. It's not just the adults freaking out over this. It's scary, really scary!
I don't want to address all of this (and I delayed replying until the last minute, I planned to earlier but was so demoralized/distracted by the idea of being in my 40s, 50, 60s, and still living at home with my parents/father; it's embarrassing to live at home with your parents at this age but I wouldn't mind living with my mother on principle/not being able to leave the house; before my parents pass and I likely become homeless or at the very least unable to care for myself. I have no id, no driver's license, no job history, I don't know what I'm going to do; and it's cold to say but one of my greatest fears is my father outliving my mother and being stuck alone with him. Sorry for the off-topic) but the counter arguments, or rather sentiments, can be frustrating. There seems to be this common theme with left-leaning people that if a relationship involves a power imbalance then consent is not possible but I don't know why they think that one can't consent to a relationship that involves a power imbalance even if one shouldn't. The ability to consent is determined by cognitive capacity and possessing relevant information (which isn't to say that I don't think someone can meaningfully consent to something with unpredictable consequences or that they don't fully understand in consideration of their own ignorance but no one is withholding information that would affect someone's choice to consent to x in order to gain access to their property or body that would otherwise not be granted), it's not negated by one party having some kind of advantage that the other person doesn't, so even if relationships that involve power imbalances are bad the in-some-respects weaker party can still consent to them. 'Power' is also defined very vaguely, I understand it to be the ability to shape reality in desired ways so what specifically can older people as older people do that younger people can't? The parent-child and teacher-student relationships are built on power imbalances but that doesn't apply to all adult-child relationships. 'Abuse' and 'exploitation' are also thrown around but they only work, as injustices, with a clearly outlined concept of harm.

It can't be that child-adult relationships necessarily cause pain (it's all the more dishonest to pretend that adolescents don't feel sexual desire when their bodies are 'designed' to reproduce and I don't deny that sexuality can be present from birth but I think many people will admit to some sexual/romantic feelings from around 6/7 at least), even if you want to make a risk-based argument against permitting something that might cause pain, so is the idea really that child-adult sexual relationships harm children even if they don't cause pain and, by the admission of people who hold the conventional view, they have no informed desire to avoid them so it's not against their will? You can't just say that it's 'abusive' or 'exploitative' to manipulate a certain emotional response because you have to elaborate on the actual harm caused. You can insist that it categorically causes pain but this is just intellectually dishonest, we can imagine 'hypothetical' scenarios where children or minors don't suffer as a result of some kind of erotic or romantic relationship with an 'adult' if you don't believe the people who claim to have not suffered as a result of such a relationship they had with an adult as a child. A single exception to a possible or supposed rule would show that it doesn't have to cause psychological harm. Nor can you hide behind suffering as a value to legitimize anti-age-gap prejudice because opposing minor-adult relationships on the possibility that they might cause children emotional distress and opposing minor-adult intimacy on principle are fundamentally different positions (again, you can 'theoretically' have minor-adult relationships without psychological harm and of course people suffer for reasons that have nothing to do with age-gap sex/romance so they're two different things that can exist independently of one another).

Lastly, you might understand 'harm' in non-hedonistic terms but in a scenario where child-adult sexual intimacy doesn't cause children to actually suffer I don't care. I'm OK with 'rape,' 'abuse,' 'exploitation,' etc. insofar as they don't cause pain or deprive anyone of happiness, and while there are victimless 'crimes' that I still believe to be immoral although not unjust nothing about an attraction to children or minors inherently implies devaluing their happiness which is necessarily immoral.

One thing I'd disagree with many people on here about is the emphasis on the injustice of restricting minor sexuality being rooted in the violation of their autonomy (as opposed to the devaluing of their happiness or the willingness to cause unnecessary suffering. 'Injustice' in my mind requires actual harm caused + malice or negligence), so I can't really co-sign some of your rhetoric even though I can appreciate how misguided paternalism can actually cause minors to suffer unnecessarily, ironically. It's a similar thing with feminism where probably most of the grievances they have that aren't completely incoherent still only make sense, or half-sense, from the standpoint of traditional patriarchy devaluing their rational agency but not necessarily their suffering or emotional well-being (which feminists often do themselves, and average women's preferences push/ed for a lot of this) being unjust for that reason (feminism is another topic, I am so turned off by and frustrated with that culture). I do think children's/adolescent's suffering is often devalued in traditional cultures (i.e. children are to be seen not heard, the man is the head of the house and his rule is law and the use of violence and aggression is used to enforce that; it's not just about him guiding them benevolently like a good shepherd but the idea that he deserves greater respect etc.) but the devaluing of rational agency or autonomy per se is not 'dehumanizing' in a way that I find ultimately objectionable. Again, I won't address some other things that aren't a big deal to me.
User avatar
CantChainTheSpirit
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:23 am

Re: Predictions for the future based on current events

Post by CantChainTheSpirit »

It could play out that way but it's impossible to predict.

I do think it's reaching such a level of hysteria that it's causing cracks throughout society. Epstein doesn't sound like a nice man but I don't consider him a pedophile. But it's a useful term to use for focusing anger. It's far from over, the net grows wider, pulling in royals, politicians, presidents, celebrities, billionaires, business leaders and more. Those who have used the weapon of calling opponents pedophiles are being caught up in their own webs. More will fall, more will fear falling. It isn't just those in power, it's those who work for those in power as well, who knew what.

This series of events is only possible because of the background of hysteria about pedophilia that already existed. This is only feeding that rage and hysteria more.

I think it will continue to grow, hysteria and rage and more and more people will be caught in the web. Innocent people, every day people. I think you are right that it will impact more and more people in every day life. Tickling your kid? Pedophile. Taking a photo of your kid at the beach or playground? Pedophile. Holding your kids hand? Pedophile. Sharing a photo with family and friends online of your kid? Pedophile. We are mostly there already. I read of a grandfather taking a photo of his granddaughter in a shopping center was reported as a pedophile before being released. People sending photos of their kids rash to a doctor, sharing a beach photo with family, just being out with their own kids, examples of them being accused and even arrested. If it continues it would reach a point when no adult would be allowed near a kid, not even their own, total segregation.

I don't think we'll get there because it will snap back long before that point. Maybe the threat of the Epstein files being misused to settle old political debts, maybe it'll be more and more online services being restricted, maybe it'll be increased parental scrutiny, there will be a point when people will see what's happening and hit back. I don't think it'll take much, people are a heard and follow new narratives quickly. I have a friend who was very very pro Meghan Markle, then her circle of friends and social media turned against her and she flipped 180 degrees quickly to now being very anti Meghan Markle. When I ask her why and present her with her old views and her old reasoning she just comes back with "well on Facebook and my friends say otherwise".

I think it will flip for pedophiles and it will be fairly rapid, it just needs the right news story, the right event to be in everyone's mind and then pivot the narrative around that.
Keep every stone they throw at you. You've got castles to build.

“Hope is not something you find; it’s something you create.” – Cassian Andor
“Our fight is for those who came before us, and for those still to come.” – Mon Mothma
Scorchingwilde
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2025 10:40 am

Re: Predictions for the future based on current events

Post by Scorchingwilde »

I've been seeing the hysteria over Epstein (who, let it be known, in my opinion is an abusive trafficker of adults and minor teens alike for profit, sadistic gratification, and blackmail operations) morph into a full on moral panic and I get the sense something in the discourse around minor attraction is going to change, hopefully for the better in a swing in the other direction. I think his case is kind of similar to the historical case of white men in the US raping and abusing enslaved black women, moreso than someone crossing the socially and legally enforced lines against interracial relationships, for example, and the way the scandal is being discussed in the mainstream is largely ignorant of the trafficking element because so many children globally are trafficked for non-sexual purposes in ways they find at least tolerable, such as companies using child labor abroad from poor countries where this labor isn't a choice so much as a means of survival. There's a fundamental contradiction in the rhetoric and something's got to give, I just hope that an emphasis against human trafficking doesn't sweep up MAP identity and existence in its crosshairs if it does take on that path.
Post Reply