The language used by antis

[mrlolicon93]

One thing that has always bugged the hell out of me is the type of language that is used by antis.

Not just when they call us monsters or scum or say the typical memes or talking points you have come to expect but also, how they talk about or refer to children.

They say things like OUR CHILDREN or THEY ARE NOT YOUR CHILDREN THEY ARE OUR CHILDREN.

I'm sorry but children belong to nobody they are their own people with their own feelings wants needs opinions and desires and i fucking hate that non-pedophilic adults dehumanize them use them as a tool to push political agendas and act like they don't matter and just treat them like a piece of property until they turn 18.

Children's rights matter they are people too.

[Aspire6]

We're all evil according to antis, so it's no surprise they try to classify children under their own "care" as it excludes us from it.

Unfortunately for antis, I was once on their side when I was still in denial about myself. So when they say it, know that there's a good chance they're also in denial too.

[girllover]

It'd be interesting to hear what children these days think about antis.
When I was a kid I always saw them as self-righteous pricks who didn't give a damn about other people's feelings and simply push their own agenda.

[Fragment]

It's weird because in English the word "my" is actually polysemous.

If I say "my pencil" it means that it's a pencil that I own.

If I said "my workplace" it means that it's a workplace I'm related to.


When I, as a MAP, say "my daughter" I'm using it in the latter sense.

A lot of normies and antis, however, are using it in the former sense.

I don't see a parent-child relationship as one of ownership, but they do.

[bnkywuv]

It's weird because in English the word "my" is actually polysemous.

If I say "my pencil" it means that it's a pencil that I own.

If I said "my workplace" it means that it's a workplace I'm related to.


When I, as a MAP, say "my daughter" I'm using it in the latter sense.

A lot of normies and antis, however, are using it in the former sense.

I don't see a parent-child relationship as one of ownership, but they do.

And that in and of itself shows they're narcissistic and do not REALLY care about children, just the control they have over them to "own" them. As someone who has been treated like property by a parent like this (even in her late 30s!!!) these people will continue to treat their adult children as tools. When you point it out them it's evidence there's not real love going on.