Using social media

[Joanne7315]

Has anyone just blatantly gone on Telegram or Element and created a 'Understanding MAPs' page. I am severely tempted. Facebook and Insta probably a bit too open for me.

[Joanne7315]

oh really,, why? Sorry if a naïve question.

[bnkywuv]

Telegram shuts down things like that! Teleguard or session would be better, plus they're encrypted too!

[HumanBeing]

Social media won't bring about any significant change for the MAP community, we must start in-person communities in order to advance socially and legally.

[Cry Baby]

Has anyone just blatantly gone on Telegram or Element and created a 'Understanding MAPs' page. I am severely tempted. Facebook and Insta probably a bit too open for me.

I am getting away with this on many platforms, and it's a new thing. I'm tolerated & accepted, although I am terrifyingly bizarre. You won't see anybody else doing this but me. Simply because nobody else has tested the waters and passed as I have done.
Here's what we're gonna do.
Little Nicky Interviews with Cry Baby on social media. Vaguely, mindfully scripted so there are no problematic words or details. Will take some practice but...
It could be done and it has been done and I think that I am up to it.

[TMKnight]

What would be the steps for us to start bring attention to the peaceful nature of MAPs?

Social media no, but some how we have to get some mascots, who can weather the aftermaths of challenging the norms.

We need the world to see that we are not the monsters of human traffickers, or not all agree that kids should be intimate. But agree that the rules and regulations are harsh and need reconsideration. Because AOC is wrong, it limits the right of kids' freedoms. It takes away their right of choice. It in my opinion cause more harm then good.

I wish I could weather the storm.

[aeterna91]

This might be a bit twisted, but has anyone considered pretending to be an anti to share, amid insults, the best points, narratives and resources for MAPs out there? Someone who did that would probably avoid being banned.
You know, like...

“Ugh, look at these people! They say they don't want to harm any children and that the world is full of examples of minors having relationships with adults that they value as positive! And they're giving examples! It's disgusting!”

“These filthy pedophiles say that science supports their absurd ideas that ‘intergenerational relationships’ don't cause intrinsic harm, and they're citing these studies by Rind or Constantine! We must fight them!”

“Disgusting! This scum says that no one has ever been able to prove why a consensual sexual relationship, even at an early age, could be traumatic, except if society brainwashes you into thinking it should be!”

“These pedo-criminals say we live in a hypocritical society where, every time a minor commits a crime, everyone agrees that they are old enough to be responsible for their actions and says things like ‘if they behave like adults, treat them like adults’, but never applies that logic to sex!”

“These people say that looking at pictures of naked children can't possibly cause them any harm, because telepathy doesn't exist, and that sentencing someone to prison for that is just an excuse for the authorities to be able to check your computer and smartphone at any time and keep tabs on you! How can they think that?”

[Scorchingwilde]

This might be a bit twisted, but has anyone considered pretending to be an anti to share, amid insults, the best points, narratives and resources for MAPs out there? Someone who did that would probably avoid being banned.
You know, like...

“Ugh, look at these people! They say they don't want to harm any children and that the world is full of examples of minors having relationships with adults that they value as positive! And they're giving examples! It's disgusting!”

“These filthy pedophiles say that science supports their absurd ideas that ‘intergenerational relationships’ don't cause intrinsic harm, and they're citing these studies by Rind or Constantine! We must fight them!”

“Disgusting! This scum says that no one has ever been able to prove why a consensual sexual relationship, even at an early age, could be traumatic, except if society brainwashes you into thinking it should be!”

“These pedo-criminals say we live in a hypocritical society where, every time a minor commits a crime, everyone agrees that they are old enough to be responsible for their actions and says things like ‘if they behave like adults, treat them like adults’, but never applies that logic to sex!”

“These people say that looking at pictures of naked children can't possibly cause them any harm, because telepathy doesn't exist, and that sentencing someone to prison for that is just an excuse for the authorities to be able to check your computer and smartphone at any time and keep tabs on you! How can they think that?”

I think this could work in some cases, I know a tongue-in-cheek version of it does for boosting information leaked by whistleblowers and also online methods of media piracy.

[TMKnight]

This might be a bit twisted, but has anyone considered pretending to be an anti to share, amid insults, the best points, narratives and resources for MAPs out there? Someone who did that would probably avoid being banned.

I think we are at a point were if we all do not start push a portion of the narrative in a direction of the opposite of where it is going now. We might lose the plot.


In that there seems to be more and more calls for our deaths (the extreme right), because they are taking recent events with those damn files as cannon to what I hope most of us believe in.