A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Why don't pedophiles receive the same protections as other sexual minorities federally? If you kill someone who never hurt kids but was a pedophile, there are no hate crime enhancements they can add.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Maybe it should be.DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Human trafficking definitely should be legal. Why is the state entitled to view humans as superior to other animals. Why is the state entitled to view profit from human trafficking as inferior to other labour. I will paraphrase Andrew Jackson. They have those views because they are a den of vipers.JGHeaven wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pmMaybe it should be.DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
I have even wilder opinions but many thinks it's just kinks but noDANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:34 pmHuman trafficking definitely should be legal. Why is the state entitled to view humans as superior to other animals. Why is the state entitled to view profit from human trafficking as inferior to other labour. I will paraphrase Andrew Jackson. They have those views because they are a den of vipers.JGHeaven wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pmMaybe it should be.DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
You mean kinks like sharing your personal details on social media platforms.Walton wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 7:23 amI have even wilder opinions but many thinks it's just kinks but noDANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:34 pmHuman trafficking definitely should be legal. Why is the state entitled to view humans as superior to other animals. Why is the state entitled to view profit from human trafficking as inferior to other labour. I will paraphrase Andrew Jackson. They have those views because they are a den of vipers.JGHeaven wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pm
Maybe it should be.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
