Coyotehh wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2026 2:06 am
I personally believe it should, but it needs to actually include predators, not MAPs. There is a BIG difference between predators and pedophiles, a pedophile is someone with the attraction to pre-pubescent children, a predator is one who uses people (adults or children) for non-consensual sexual pleasure, financial gain, ect. Many predators will re-offend, and people deserve to be aware of genuine harmful people. But it needs to be greatly improved and more fair first of all.
But Predators lost the final 3 — 2. Don't be so malicious towards the losers.
Seriously: You don't know what you are talking about.
DANAT4T wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 2:22 am
I have a fun idea for your next poll. Who is the most narcissistic user. I will do my absolute best to win it.
There's an actual symptom criteria for it, which many sadly get discriminated by who aren't (in my case by an actual narcissist). Histrionic is often confused.
It is a funny idea though!
38, female. Writer, mediocre artist, and total sub!
Westernized society hates youth. MAPs are the cure. Youth are NOT slaves. They are our future and we must fight for their freedom.
I'm not so sure that having a poll on this is a good idea. Idk about Britain but the sex offender registry is definitely unconstitutional in America (not that that stops it from existing) and violates a number of principles of Western jurisprudence.
We have not particularly pro-MAP feminists who are against the registry, and admittedly they are a small minority but they are greater in number and influence than the even tinier cohort of pro-MAP feminists, many of whom recanted their views, are now elderly and inactive, or dead.
If MAP spaces can't take a line as simple that being against the registry then there isn't a lot of hope for us. This is one of those things that shouldn't even be up for debate or discussion.
