What is everyone's stance on Epstein?

[MAPallmylife66]

Having a consensual relationship is one thing, and I am all for consensual age gap relationships, but what Epstein and his class of people were doing was anything but consensual. They were coercing girls with false hopes of modeling fame, then forced them to go to an island they couldn't escape, and then forcing them to have sex with rich billionaires, who often beat the shit out of them. So in closing, Jeffrey Epstein was a reprehensible monster, and dying in prison was too good for him.

[bnkywuv]

Having a consensual relationship is one thing, and I am all for consensual age gap relationships, but what Epstein and his class of people were doing was anything but consensual. They were coercing girls with false hopes of modeling fame, then forced them to go to an island they couldn't escape, and then forcing them to have sex with rich billionaires, who often beat the shit out of them. So in closing, Jeffrey Epstein was a reprehensible monster, and dying in prison was too good for him.

And yet according to antis ALL MAPs are evil like him.......thing is, most people who abuse children like that are not true MAps/ pedophiles, but people who hate children and want them to suffer. Antis are in the same boat but most likely will not sexually abuse a child (especially their own) so they won't be lumped in the people they're pointing their fingers screaming 'WOOD CHIPPER" at.

[MAPallmylife66]

Having a consensual relationship is one thing, and I am all for consensual age gap relationships, but what Epstein and his class of people were doing was anything but consensual. They were coercing girls with false hopes of modeling fame, then forced them to go to an island they couldn't escape, and then forcing them to have sex with rich billionaires, who often beat the shit out of them. So in closing, Jeffrey Epstein was a reprehensible monster, and dying in prison was too good for him.

And yet according to antis ALL MAPs are evil like him.......thing is, most people who abuse children like that are not true MAps/ pedophiles, but people who hate children and want them to suffer. Antis are in the same boat but most likely will not sexually abuse a child (especially their own) so they won't be lumped in the people they're pointing their fingers screaming 'WOOD CHIPPER" at.

I agree, and feel that the only way to convince these anti's that we're not the monsters that they believe we are, is to speak loudly against those people that are the monsters, and show them that we actually care about kids, and wish to only advocate for their rights.

[jsjc_lover]

Pretty sure the guy was a spy and it was a whole operation to get one over on very powerful people for political purposes. So, he was a professional pedophile who was most likely just doing his job.

[PurpleHouse]

It bugs me that news reports refer to him as a paedophile. It's like if a man sexually assaults a man, would they report on him being a homosexual as his main label? Actually it's not like that because the girls weren't young enough for him to be a paedophile, and not all were minors at all. He was generally treating female persons of many ages badly and some of them were minors. Nothing to do with his sexual orentiation, paedo/hebo/ephebo/teliophile or whatever. They could more accurately call him abuser, trafficker, blackmailer, whatever.