Nepios

[msykm99]

I would like to believe your gross misjudgment on nepiophiles is innocent and just due to a communication issue, but I have a feeling its not.

It indeed is, because I’m not sure to what extent you’d go. So I apologize because I assumed, what to me, would be the worst. So I’ll clean up what I meant and be direct. Anything other than innocent touching, to me, is wrong.

[Inverse]

Hi, just want to put it out there that I am quite open and proud to identify as a [non exclusive] Nepio, happily attracted to infants and toddlers. I know that many in the MAP community are uncomfortable even with Nepios, so I stick my head above the parapet to be freely available to explain as best I can the attraction and to champion the Nepio corner.

Proud Nepio here also, it's never been easy to find others to talk to and bond with that are maps much less baby and toddler lovers. Glad to see I'm not alone in this world.

Im also a Nepio AoA 6M-3 and its hard to find fellow Nepios because there aren't many of us out there.

There are lots of us out there. We exist. And we're awesome.

[Mariamishka123]

I don't really understand what's wrong with this. If we are talking about romance and love, then this is not important) the main thing is that there is no violence and coercion! and if everything is soft, in agreement and with love) then on the contrary it’s wonderful)

[bnkywuv]

I'm not into really young simply due to the crying. If not for that I'd love em! I cannot find it in me to cuddle them because I'm super sensitive to any distress or sounds of distress even if they do not mean distress.

I am into toddlers though as they can begin to form words! Like toddlers around 2 to 3 is when I get the cuddle urge, though there's nothing quite like feeling the little primate's fingers wrapped so tightly around ones' own, a grip we lose in later life.

[MAPallmylife66]

Hi, just want to put it out there that I am quite open and proud to identify as a [non exclusive] Nepio, happily attracted to infants and toddlers. I know that many in the MAP community are uncomfortable even with Nepios, so I stick my head above the parapet to be freely available to explain as best I can the attraction and to champion the Nepio corner.

Being a MAP myself, and knowing what that means for me in this world, I see no reason to judge anyone else for their attractions. Even though I don't fancy babies myself, attraction is attraction. Something none of us have control over, so why judge?

[ReArm!]

Riddle me this, if you notice your toddler crudely attempting to hump their stuffed animal, ans you replace the stuffed animal with your hand, do you think the baby will be scarred and receive “life long trauma”? And if you do, what is the drastic difference between the grown up hand and the stuffed animal that one will cause trauma if it comes near their genitals and the other wont, and how come this same mechanism doesnt happen when it comes to other forms of genital contact like bathing or diaper changes, why is it only sexual pleasure specifically that is supposed to cause trauma, instead of anything else in the childs life that causes actual pain, and how come this only happens if it is an adult participating. Can the baby even tell the difference between a grown up hand and their plushy, and if they can, which they probably can, why are we assuming that they would care so much about the difference(mind you, these are the same people that play with their feces), that they would be “traumatized” and suffer life long permanent damage once they realize they are blindly humping the “wrong” object?

I know I'm late, but let me tell you I love the explanaition. I think this is precisely what people MUST understand, not only with nepiophilia, but all MAPs in general. The belief that sexual pleasure causes lifelong trauma defies all logic and common sense. It usually has stupid limits that don't make sense at all.

[johnnydoe12345]

It’s as simple as this : if I steal $300 worth of clothes from h&m (which is larceny) I have every right to tell someone not to steal their neighbor’s car (which is grand larceny). The person committing grand larceny has every right to tell me I’m wrong as well, but their is a moral difference between the two. H&m can recover from the theft quicker than the neighbor who got their car stolen. The neighbor works a 9-5 and you just ruined their lively hood.

Being attracted to infants is fine. We aren’t judging you on that because you were dealt those cards. Trying to justify sex with infants is like trying to justify drinking bleach. In no world does it make sense nor is it okay. The physical harm you would cause to this infant is unbearable. Might even cause death. To sit here and call us one of the same is disrespectful. There is 0 justification for sex with an infant.

Anti C logic.

You can fondle their genitals or LIGHT careful penetration with lots of lube. They will a) not remember it which is less risky than older children and B) not feel any notable pain unless they happen to somehow find out much later and are convinced by society that they have 'sexual trauma'

[This comment is the poster's personal opinion, and Mu does not advocate engaging in such behavior]