Will there be more MAPs joining the community in a decade from now?

[girllover]

Kids sexting or sharing nude images of themselves or their peers online. Particularly those of girls.
Do you think such early exposure is going to increase the number of people(at least men) who'd identify as non-exclusive MAPs in the near future?

[FairBlueLove]

Do you think that exposure to such content is needed for somebody to identify her-himself as a MAP?

[ReArm!]

Maybe. Young access to porn and sexuality is definitely a good thing for society if we wanna fight puritanism. That's why puritans are always trying to ban it. They talk about it increasing the libido for younger generations, and they're definitely not wrong, but they fail to question wether it's actually a bad phenomena.

[bnkywuv]

Maybe. Young access to porn and sexuality is definitely a good thing for society if we wanna fight puritanism. That's why puritans are always trying to ban it. They talk about it increasing the libido for younger generations, and they're definitely not wrong, but they fail to question wether it's actually a bad phenomena.

An increase in libido could be dangerous because girls get pregnant too young I've heard it an cause health complications so there's that risk. However sexual contact with minors DOES NOT HAVE TO INVOLVE acts that result in pregnancy either. I'm not just talking about contraception or birth control.

We also need to teach them that what they see in porn IS NOT how sex really is, nor how everyone likes it. There's a lot of touching and body contact, not this pounding and degradation. Not all females enjoy being called sluts, whores, bitches, etc. and treated like objects, same with males.

[bnkywuv]

Kids sexting or sharing nude images of themselves or their peers online. Particularly those of girls.
Do you think such early exposure is going to increase the number of people(at least men) who'd identify as non-exclusive MAPs in the near future?

It could make those who are already MAPs (exclusive or nonexclusive) realize it sooner, but I don't think it's going to covert anyone. I think that could be good enough for our cause.

[ReArm!]

An increase in libido could be dangerous because girls get pregnant too young I've heard it an cause health complications so there's that risk. However sexual contact with minors DOES NOT HAVE TO INVOLVE acts that result in pregnancy either. I'm not just talking about contraception or birth control.

We also need to teach them that what they see in porn IS NOT how sex really is, nor how everyone likes it. There's a lot of touching and body contact, not this pounding and degradation. Not all females enjoy being called sluts, whores, bitches, etc. and treated like objects, same with males.

Agreed, I don't want any teen pregnancies either! Sex positivity does not mean we can't be careful with practical complications.

And yeah, sex as it seems in porn is not all there is about sex, but let's not shame those who like those things either, just let everybody enjoy what they like ;D

[MAPallmylife66]

Do you think that exposure to such content is needed for somebody to identify her-himself as a MAP?

One word answer. No!

[bnkywuv]

Agreed, I don't want any teen pregnancies either! Sex positivity does not mean we can't be careful with practical complications.

And yeah, sex as it seems in porn is not all there is about sex, but let's not shame those who like those things either, just let everybody enjoy what they like ;D

Wasn't intending to shame. Sorry if it came off that way.

[Scorchingwilde]

Kids sexting or sharing nude images of themselves or their peers online. Particularly those of girls.
Do you think such early exposure is going to increase the number of people(at least men) who'd identify as non-exclusive MAPs in the near future?

It could make those who are already MAPs (exclusive or nonexclusive) realize it sooner, but I don't think it's going to covert anyone. I think that could be good enough for our cause.

ding ding ding!

It's a representation thing imo, and being able to experience their sexuality at a younger age without shame and cognitive dissonance is going to allow them to remember kids are sexual when they're older themselves.

[ReArm!]

Wasn't intending to shame. Sorry if it came off that way.

No I didn't mean it for you I'm sorry, it's just that most of the time someone critizises how sex is percieved in porn they usually also think that kind of sex is in some way worse than vanilla sex.