Argument for pro contact

A place to debate contact stances and possible reforms. You can express pro-c, pro-reform, or anti-c views. Just be respectful and do not advocate engaging in criminalized sexual relationships.
Post Reply
User avatar
MAPallmylife66
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2026 3:40 am

Argument for pro contact

Post by MAPallmylife66 »

I'm new here, so I don't know if this has been discussed before here, but I was thinking yesterday. Antis are against MAP because they believe that we will willingly harm kids, right? Well what about Parents who willingly assault their own kids in the name of discipline? Spanking, smacking, kicking a child in the name of discipline, because the adult in the room can't deal with the fact that their child is desperately wanting attention, seems to be largely ignored in society, but giving a child a consensual loving kiss on the lips, or touching them in an intimate way, when the child wants the contact, is the most heinous crime imaginable.

This doesn't make any sense to me. Children desire attention, preferably loving attention. It's what they crave more than anything, but yet society denies them the attention they want, and replaces it with attention they don't want. If the powers that be want to make MAP/AAM contact illegal, then spanking, or even yelling angrily at a child, should also be equally illegal.

Kids look to adults for guidance in this world. They don't look to us for discipline. They look to us for love and protection, not spankings, and angry smacks across the face. These are things that a true MAP would never think of doing to a child, yet we're seen as the evil ones, because we actually, unconditionally love children, whether they're acting up because they're seeking guidance or not. We're the ones who can provide them with the good feelings they want.

Thoughts?
A MAP/YAP that wishes only equal rights and representation for all people, of all ages, genders and sexual preferences. People should not be seen as illegal, simply for how they were born! Preferences girls ages 6 through 10. To me they are all beautiful!
User avatar
FairBlueLove
Posts: 415
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2024 5:38 pm

Re: Argument for pro contact

Post by FairBlueLove »

It doesn't make any sense to me too, and I fully agree with your analysis.

But let's try to imagine one thing an anti would say: Discipline is applied without self-interest, for the good of the kid, while trying to have sex with a kid is loaded with self interest.

I invite any anti present here to try to complete/correct/expand that assumption.
When society judges without understanding, it silences hearts that yearn for connection.
weird.organisms
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2026 2:54 am

Re: Argument for pro contact

Post by weird.organisms »

MAPallmylife66 wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2026 5:11 pm I'm new here, so I don't know if this has been discussed before here, but I was thinking yesterday. Antis are against MAP because they believe that we will willingly harm kids, right? Well what about Parents who willingly assault their own kids in the name of discipline? Spanking, smacking, kicking a child in the name of discipline, because the adult in the room can't deal with the fact that their child is desperately wanting attention, seems to be largely ignored in society, but giving a child a consensual loving kiss on the lips, or touching them in an intimate way, when the child wants the contact, is the most heinous crime imaginable.

This doesn't make any sense to me. Children desire attention, preferably loving attention. It's what they crave more than anything, but yet society denies them the attention they want, and replaces it with attention they don't want. If the powers that be want to make MAP/AAM contact illegal, then spanking, or even yelling angrily at a child, should also be equally illegal.

Kids look to adults for guidance in this world. They don't look to us for discipline. They look to us for love and protection, not spankings, and angry smacks across the face. These are things that a true MAP would never think of doing to a child, yet we're seen as the evil ones, because we actually, unconditionally love children, whether they're acting up because they're seeking guidance or not. We're the ones who can provide them with the good feelings they want.

Thoughts?
THIS is why i think antis hate children. They only want to give them negative contact then blow it off later and act like they're sorry when they're not.

These people are full of hatred and enjoy hurting others, and no, i don't believe trauma or abuse is the cause. They clearly enjoy being cruel and hate seeing anyone being nice to their property. They. Are. Evil. I don't know why evolution would ever allow such a horrible thing to take root. don't even get started on god.

Then they'll just turn around and accuse us doing more harm to them because they cannot stand knowing their kid would be happier and loved by someone else. It completely takes away their ability to feel powerful as people who want to feel powerful hate people who are kind and love to hurt and dehumanize their victims.

Maybe this is why AAMs are becoming higher in numbers? They're turning to MAPs because they don't get the love they deserve?
Writer, mediocre artist, and total sub!
Westernized society hates youth. MAPs are the cure. Youth are NOT slaves. They are our future and we must fight for their freedom.
Post Reply