Circumcision

[GL_in_Lyrics]

It's already legal to sexually assault little boys with knives, therefore I don't think it could be any different for simply allowing children to consent to sexual activity...

[ReArm!]

It's already legal to sexually assault little boys with knives, therefore I don't think it could be any different for simply allowing children to consent to sexual activity...

what? What do you mean? Or am I js too stupid

[GL_in_Lyrics]

It's already legal to sexually assault little boys with knives, therefore I don't think it could be any different for simply allowing children to consent to sexual activity...

what? What do you mean? Or am I js too stupid

Don't worry. I was talking about circumcision, which is the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity. If a society can function, at least somewhat with that going on, then it can function with children being allowed to consent to sexual activity.

[ReArm!]

Don't worry. I was talking about circumcision, which is the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity. If a society can function, at least somewhat with that going on, then it can function with children being allowed to consent to sexual activity.

Oh, ok yeah, although idk why would circumcision be that bad, like sure you shouldn't do it, there's no point in it, and it can be painful ofc, fuck you're striping away someone's skin. But, unless there's something I'm missing, I feel like "the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity" is quite a stretch.

Also wasn't it done for medical reasons sometimes? They almost did it to me since I had trouble with my skin coming apart when I was younger.

[Jim Burton]

Giving this the benefit of the doubt and categorizing as a Youth Liberation topic until it gets political.

[GL_in_Lyrics]

Don't worry. I was talking about circumcision, which is the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity. If a society can function, at least somewhat with that going on, then it can function with children being allowed to consent to sexual activity.

Oh, ok yeah, although idk why would circumcision be that bad, like sure you shouldn't do it, there's no point in it, and it can be painful ofc, fuck you're striping away someone's skin. But, unless there's something I'm missing, I feel like "the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity" is quite a stretch.

Also wasn't it done for medical reasons sometimes? They almost did it to me since I had trouble with my skin coming apart when I was younger.

Sigh.... you sound quite young. Maybe you're just ignorant on the matter. But the first sentences in your first paragraph summed up quite nicely why it's wrong. And it's the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity, because it is the only form of it which is 100% impossible to recover from, physically (and sometimes mentally), in ALL cases. It's clear and cut, open and shut. Other forms of child sexual abuse aren't like that 100% of the time.

And yeah, often boys will need to be circumcised... usually that happens when their foreskins are not taken care of properly, or when they are misdiagnosed, etc. I'd like to see the statistics on girls who "need" to be circumcised in some way or another, although we all know feminists do NOT allow such statistics, just as they do not allow statistics which may prove child/adult sex to be beneficial!

All forms of circumcision are worse than rape, and are totally unnecessary 99.9% of the time, whether or not we're talking about boys or girls.

Now, even if I'm wrong about it (circumcision) being the worst form of child sexual abuse, my point still stands: If a society can survive an assault like circumcision, it can survive giving children rights!

[weird.organisms]

Circumcision also removes a majority of nerve endings, depriving boys and girls of pleasure they would ordinarily have. In that way I could see it being worse than rape. We're literally removing pleasure sensing nerves for their entire lives based on outdated cultural practices and they cannot consent to it in any way. Oh sure. One of the arguments I've heard is that the kid will be made fun of in school for being uncut, but that's where the parents love and caring should step in, teaching their child not to care what other people think of them.

That and uncut men just looks sexier to me. Circumcised dicks freak me out.

[Scorchingwilde]

Don't worry. I was talking about circumcision, which is the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity. If a society can function, at least somewhat with that going on, then it can function with children being allowed to consent to sexual activity.

Oh, ok yeah, although idk why would circumcision be that bad, like sure you shouldn't do it, there's no point in it, and it can be painful ofc, fuck you're striping away someone's skin. But, unless there's something I'm missing, I feel like "the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity" is quite a stretch.

Also wasn't it done for medical reasons sometimes? They almost did it to me since I had trouble with my skin coming apart when I was younger.

Sigh.... you sound quite young. Maybe you're just ignorant on the matter. But the first sentences in your first paragraph summed up quite nicely why it's wrong. And it's the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity, because it is the only form of it which is 100% impossible to recover from, physically (and sometimes mentally), in ALL cases. It's clear and cut, open and shut. Other forms of child sexual abuse aren't like that 100% of the time.
....
All forms of circumcision are worse than rape, and are totally unnecessary 99.9% of the time, whether or not we're talking about boys or girls.

I agree. I'd like to add into that all the surgeries done on kids and infants who are intersex that don't count as circumcisions are also as bad. I'm not talking about making a functional urethra so they can pee, but all of the cosmetic cutting away/out of "excess" length or removing vaginal tissue that can't be undone.

[GL_in_Lyrics]

Oh, ok yeah, although idk why would circumcision be that bad, like sure you shouldn't do it, there's no point in it, and it can be painful ofc, fuck you're striping away someone's skin. But, unless there's something I'm missing, I feel like "the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity" is quite a stretch.

Also wasn't it done for medical reasons sometimes? They almost did it to me since I had trouble with my skin coming apart when I was younger.

Sigh.... you sound quite young. Maybe you're just ignorant on the matter. But the first sentences in your first paragraph summed up quite nicely why it's wrong. And it's the worst form of child sexual abuse known to humanity, because it is the only form of it which is 100% impossible to recover from, physically (and sometimes mentally), in ALL cases. It's clear and cut, open and shut. Other forms of child sexual abuse aren't like that 100% of the time.
....
All forms of circumcision are worse than rape, and are totally unnecessary 99.9% of the time, whether or not we're talking about boys or girls.

I agree. I'd like to add into that all the surgeries done on kids and infants who are intersex that don't count as circumcisions are also as bad. I'm not talking about making a functional urethra so they can pee, but all of the cosmetic cutting away/out of "excess" length or removing vaginal tissue that can't be undone.

Also very much agreed.

[PorcelainLark]

I'm strongly against circumcision. It's pretty fucked up. I find it hard to wrap my head around it being routine in America. Gross shit.

Why the fuck is is this thread simultaneously about a world without an age of sexual consent and circumcision at the same time? If OP changed the title of the thread, I'll be giving a warning. Don't change thread titles because people disagree with you.