an U.S federal appeals court defends mere possession of AI-made CP

[HumanBeing]

The First Amendment protects an individual’s right to privately possess images or videos of child pornography created using artificial intelligence — if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home, a federal appeals court judge ruled Tuesday

Source (by an Anti media):
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolo ... se-images/

Will America finally restore its constitutional freedom?

[Kierkegaard]

This only applies to possession, not production or distribution, so in practice you can still be imprisoned for having AI made CP if you used a local model to create it(production) or sent it over the internet(distribution).

It's a pretty narrow loophole.

[HumanBeing]

This only applies to possession, not production or distribution, so in practice you can still be imprisoned for having AI made CP if you used a local model to create it(production) or sent it over the internet(distribution).

It's a pretty narrow loophole.

Yeah but its still a good start for any debate about CP laws

[mrlolicon93]

This only applies to possession, not production or distribution, so in practice you can still be imprisoned for having AI made CP if you used a local model to create it(production) or sent it over the internet(distribution).

It's a pretty narrow loophole.

True but regardless i would still consider this a win for maps.