are map's more sexual or romantic?

[nyesyes]

that's honestly my question i have nothing else in mind lol

[Lennon72]

It depends on the MAP.

[TheMigoos2]

Some are sexual, mostly porn addicts and actually dangerous individuals but there is a minority who truly cares for the children who is more into feelings rather than flesh...

[Brain O'Conner]

Some are sexual, mostly porn addicts and actually dangerous individuals but there is a minority who truly cares for the children who is more into feelings rather than flesh...

I have to disagree with you on fact on how you view maps as mostly porn addicts that only cares about the body of the person and nothing else. You equating sexual feelings to flesh is just debasing, as if to say erotic is not a feeling and is compared to hunger. You're right, someone who truly cares for a person does not solely care for their flesh to be replaced for the next person and nothing else, but to go on and say most maps objectify children/minors, then you are sorely mistaken. I swear, how long have you been studying this community?

[Brain O'Conner]

There is really nothing to this question. Maps are not any different than teleiophiles when it comes to feeling sexual and romantic/emotional attractions. There are maps that are more sexual or romantic than teleiophiles, and there are teleiophiles that are more sexual or romantic than maps. It's no different than asking the question of if John is more sexual than Rob and their both teleiophiles; we don't know. It depends on the person.

[BLueRibbon]

The recent Mu survey suggested a strong lean toward romanticism, although a sexual orientation will always have sexual components.

[TheMigoos2]

Some are sexual, mostly porn addicts and actually dangerous individuals but there is a minority who truly cares for the children who is more into feelings rather than flesh...

I have to disagree with you on fact on how you view maps as mostly porn addicts that only cares about the body of the person and nothing else. You equating sexual feelings to flesh is just debasing, as if to say erotic is not a feeling and is compared to hunger. You're right, someone who truly cares for a person does not solely care for their flesh to be replaced for the next person and nothing else, but to go on and say most maps objectify children/minors, then you are sorely mistaken. I swear, how long have you been studying this community?

I have forgotten a lot about ourselves, i come back from a long sequence of a black and white perspective. I have forgotten about the erotica of each other but i am in a state where it disgust me. The idea of pleasure around our deepest natural form of connection as human beings makes me disconnected. I don't think its about them, i think its about me. Im just confused

[MAP romance God]

It's hard to get accurate scientific or statistical information on anything related to pedophilia (or hebephilia/ephebophilia for that matter) given how taboo the topic is, but going by my personal experience and observations, I'd say the people who are genuinely attracted to children, especially primarily or exclusively, tend to be nice, respectful, sensitive and overwhelmingly romantic and idealistic.

The stereotypical "pedophile" who violently rapes kids is a whole other ball game, likely people who suffer from conditions that hinder their empathy and impulse control and very often not even primarily attracted to children.

Speaking for myself, I'm extremely romantic. I love the idea of living a cute, soft romance with a little girl in which all of her physical, mental and logistical limitations are very well respected and we find enjoyment in the little things we can share. As for sex, I do have a high sex drive, but I don't think having sex with kids would be reasonable considering how tricky it can be and also the fact that I can get like 80-90% of the sexual pleasure with a a grown woman - this is an estimation btw (: