A question for (fellow) kodocons.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:28 am
A question for (fellow) kodocons.
Does your attraction to fictional neophytes(paedos to be particular) mirror that of those true, or do you find substantial difference between the two? To share first, it isn't rare for me to be disgusted by the proportions of children, though their depiction in such artwork almost never brings any discomfort. It is worth noting that my disgust for irl childish figures is nearly exclusive to the male population.
- PorcelainLark
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm
Re: A question for (fellow) kodocons.
Yeah, I don't like lolis unless they have a literal flat chest, not small or budding. That reflects my AoA. Hebephiles get out REEEEE 

AKA WandersGlade.
Re: A question for (fellow) kodocons.
FLAT IS JUSTICE!PorcelainLark wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 12:13 pm Yeah, I don't like lolis unless they have a literal flat chest, not small or budding. That reflects my AoA. Hebephiles get out REEEEE![]()
As for me I find loli almost as attractive as irl girls real girls are just heavenly and so elegant when they are flat and not at all developed
- PorcelainLark
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm
Re: A question for (fellow) kodocons.
https://imgdrop.io/image/94559835-66557 ... 9JjX.6OtjhWalton wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 1:26 pmFLAT IS JUSTICE!PorcelainLark wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 12:13 pm Yeah, I don't like lolis unless they have a literal flat chest, not small or budding. That reflects my AoA. Hebephiles get out REEEEE![]()
As for me I find loli almost as attractive as irl girls real girls are just heavenly and so elegant when they are flat and not at all developed![]()
AKA WandersGlade.