Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
My main objective on the subject of pedophilia is to openly come out and tell all those Anti-pedo establishment scholars, advocates, the MSM as a whole, that their stand against pedophilia or their foundational proclamation that “children below a certain age. say 18 are INCAPABLE of giving informed sexual consent.” is a dogma, totally unscientific, fraudulent notion if not an outright lie and prove it on the objective scientific grounds even before a Judges in the court (on behalf of the people accused of pedophilia) to make them difficult to deny. If we (MAP advocates) able to prove it openly and most importantly on those MSM forums. I believe it will bring a vast change in the social attitude towards pedophilia in the general population. We need to boldly stand up and “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
-
RoosterDance
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2024 3:27 am
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
What is MSM?
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
MSM, is Main Stream Media.
-
RoosterDance
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2024 3:27 am
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
I see. Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure telling them all that won't really affect anything. Some of them even probably already know. The problem is, those that don't know, or just disagree, aren't willing to listen. And even if they were, none can go against the popular narrative because it would pretty much instantly end their careers. No one wants to do that.
No, the change must start with the citizenry. The average people.
No, the change must start with the citizenry. The average people.
-
RoosterDance
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2024 3:27 am
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
And let me say, I hate being such a downer on your efforts. I very much appreciate your enthusiasm, but we gotta make sure we're channeling that effort into effective methods. All this "Prove it with science" stuff has already been tried. For decades even. The studies and evidence are all already out there. The populace just continues to censor all of it.
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
What's problematic with this approach is that the evidence to support us already exists, it just gets censored. For example, the US government censored the Rind study which helps support our position.
Contrary to how people act, the majority in our society don't really follow the science when it comes to deeply rooted beliefs. What science they do agree with is usually one that just so happens to align with their beliefs at the time; or rather, doesn't challenge them. When people say, "I'm willing to change my opinion in the face of evidence", they mean that for things that don't really matter to them emotionally — like how fast an asteroid orbiting a planet moves, or what classification of arthropod this animal technically is. These things don't challenge core beliefs. When evidence does challenge core beliefs, it's ignored.
Contrary to how people act, the majority in our society don't really follow the science when it comes to deeply rooted beliefs. What science they do agree with is usually one that just so happens to align with their beliefs at the time; or rather, doesn't challenge them. When people say, "I'm willing to change my opinion in the face of evidence", they mean that for things that don't really matter to them emotionally — like how fast an asteroid orbiting a planet moves, or what classification of arthropod this animal technically is. These things don't challenge core beliefs. When evidence does challenge core beliefs, it's ignored.
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
.
Thank you for all your replies to my post: "Pedophilia: CALL A SPADE A SPADE” it might sound discouraging but I don't see in that way. "Trying it again and again" can lead to success, if we are on the right path. I definitely see at least some glimmer of hope, in the younger MAP generation.
In my post I suggested "fight…..on behalf of the people accused of pedophilia". I believe if someone gets the contact addresses of such persons or their lawyers or their victim forums to discuss this matter on its scientific basis. It could be the starting point. First we need to have self-confidant in ourselves to prove those anti--pedo gangs are actually the perpetrators of making it into a criminal offence and ruining the life of innocent people. First we need a strong theory based on objective scientific grounds that there is nothing wrong or harmful about the MAP. It will not be done in one day, a month or year but we will succeed if we persist. Writing to the International Human Right forums or the international courts of justice, even to the rationalist, atheist, nudist there could be many more of such forums that we could write appeal in a organized way.
Can anyone contribute to this chain of thought?
I am putting my next thought effort to write a small article like: “Science fact can prove children capable of giving their sexual consent”
Thank you for all your replies to my post: "Pedophilia: CALL A SPADE A SPADE” it might sound discouraging but I don't see in that way. "Trying it again and again" can lead to success, if we are on the right path. I definitely see at least some glimmer of hope, in the younger MAP generation.
In my post I suggested "fight…..on behalf of the people accused of pedophilia". I believe if someone gets the contact addresses of such persons or their lawyers or their victim forums to discuss this matter on its scientific basis. It could be the starting point. First we need to have self-confidant in ourselves to prove those anti--pedo gangs are actually the perpetrators of making it into a criminal offence and ruining the life of innocent people. First we need a strong theory based on objective scientific grounds that there is nothing wrong or harmful about the MAP. It will not be done in one day, a month or year but we will succeed if we persist. Writing to the International Human Right forums or the international courts of justice, even to the rationalist, atheist, nudist there could be many more of such forums that we could write appeal in a organized way.
Can anyone contribute to this chain of thought?
I am putting my next thought effort to write a small article like: “Science fact can prove children capable of giving their sexual consent”
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
You don't have to change the world, every drop in the ocean of truthful advocacy moves the float in the right direction.
When it comes to age there are many things that make no sense, but they are the rule.
In the UK for example, at 16 you can leave school and get a job, or join the army, or have sex, but you can't rent a place to live, can't drink alcohol, can't sell items through eBay or Facebook marketplace. Think about that, you're old enough to make a decision to leave education and work or join the army, you're old enough to have any kind of freaky sex you want, but you can't sell your bike on Facebook or eBay.
Or consider this, you can legally have sex at 16, but not watch porn. So you can kneel down and have 15 friends masturbate on your face before breaking out the mixed dildo set for freaky sex play, but if you can't watch someone get erotic on video or a picture or even look at AI generated erotica.
Or at 16 you can have freaky sex, but not get married. You can join the army, you can become a crab fisherman in dangerous conditions, but you can't get married or drink a beer in public. You're mature enough to leave education and make life changing decisions like that and you consent to do what your employer tells you or you're instructed to do in the army, but you can't consent to flash a boob for a camera.
The law is full of moronic contradictions.
When it comes to age there are many things that make no sense, but they are the rule.
In the UK for example, at 16 you can leave school and get a job, or join the army, or have sex, but you can't rent a place to live, can't drink alcohol, can't sell items through eBay or Facebook marketplace. Think about that, you're old enough to make a decision to leave education and work or join the army, you're old enough to have any kind of freaky sex you want, but you can't sell your bike on Facebook or eBay.
Or consider this, you can legally have sex at 16, but not watch porn. So you can kneel down and have 15 friends masturbate on your face before breaking out the mixed dildo set for freaky sex play, but if you can't watch someone get erotic on video or a picture or even look at AI generated erotica.
Or at 16 you can have freaky sex, but not get married. You can join the army, you can become a crab fisherman in dangerous conditions, but you can't get married or drink a beer in public. You're mature enough to leave education and make life changing decisions like that and you consent to do what your employer tells you or you're instructed to do in the army, but you can't consent to flash a boob for a camera.
The law is full of moronic contradictions.
Keep every stone they throw at you. You've got castles to build.
The power of the people is stronger than the people in power.
To endaavor to domineer over conscience, is to invade the citadel of heaven.
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
The power of the people is stronger than the people in power.
To endaavor to domineer over conscience, is to invade the citadel of heaven.
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
I for one never listen to the so called experts. I didn't wake up one day and say to myself " I'm going to be A pedophile for now on" why would anyone think that. I hate that people think it's A mental issue. Well for me it's not and never has been. I knew I was Gay from A young age. And thought the years had sex with men. But I always know It wasn't A man I wanted to be with. I have always considered my sexual orientation to be PEDOPHILE/BOYLOVER. I have not been with A man in 20+ years. If that means no sex, so be it. I need to be true to myself who I am. A MAP, PEDOPHIL/BOYLOVER
61 year old male. My sexual orientation is PEDOPHILE/BOYLOVER. A.O.A. 3-9 years old. Never felt shame for my attraction for young boys.
Re: Pedophilia: “CALL A SPADE A SPADE”.
MAP should confront the MSM with this facts and evidences, obsoletely in every non-violence way. Take the fight at their own battle ground like the pedo-hunt, sex offenders list and many other forums. Is it not possibleOutis wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:17 pm You don't have to change the world, every drop in the ocean of truthful advocacy moves the float in the right direction.
When it comes to age there are many things that make no sense, but they are the rule.
In the UK for example, at 16 you can leave school and get a job, or join the army, or have sex, but you can't rent a place to live, can't drink alcohol, can't sell items through eBay or Facebook marketplace. Think about that, you're old enough to make a decision to leave education and work or join the army, you're old enough to have any kind of freaky sex you want, but you can't sell your bike on Facebook or eBay.
Or consider this, you can legally have sex at 16, but not watch porn. So you can kneel down and have 15 friends masturbate on your face before breaking out the mixed dildo set for freaky sex play, but if you can't watch someone get erotic on video or a picture or even look at AI generated erotica.
Or at 16 you can have freaky sex, but not get married. You can join the army, you can become a crab fisherman in dangerous conditions, but you can't get married or drink a beer in public. You're mature enough to leave education and make life changing decisions like that and you consent to do what your employer tells you or you're instructed to do in the army, but you can't consent to flash a boob for a camera.
The law is full of moronic contradictions.