ANTI-PEDO FUNDAMENTAL BELIEF: SEX HARMS CHILDREN LIKE ALCOHOL TOBACO Etc.

[Valerian]

Let us visit again and again to the anti-pedo establishments fundamental proclamation that declares any acts of adults attracted to minors considered as pedophilia which will directly or indirectly harms the children. This idea comes from their fundamental beliefs that claims; ‘Sex Harms children’. I have already questioned the scientifical basis of this anti-pedo doctrine specially in the two sub-sections named: 1. CHILDREN INCAPABLE OF “INFORMED” CONCENT. 2 GROOMING OF CHILDREN: RELIGION VEG AND NONVEGITARIANISM, NUDE FAMILIES, TRANS AND DRAG QUEEN SHOWS, published in my main theorical draft on this subject in the blog post. [https://anticorruptionfight.blogspot.com/] also some part of it, in my comment to the MAP post [“My views on consent and ages as an abolitionist] dated Jan 20, 2025. I will be also dealing with the same topic in my upcoming post “Hypocrisy of child sexual consent”. However, in this present article, I would like to basically repudiate the anti-pedo dogma that purports ‘Sexual Consent causes grave harms to the children’

When we ask to the Anti-pedo’s, are there any other matters, in which, children are incapable of giving their informed consent other than the Sex. Many of them scratch their heads to find some rational answers, perhaps end up saying, ‘child grooming is bad’. However we can prove that children are groomed basically in every aspect of their life, eating, dressing, education, culture, lifestyle, beliefs sports and many other things, to manipulate the child’s behaviors to make them learn, is basically not wrong or bad. Now suddenly a genius in the crowd will raise his/her hand and say “children are forbidden to do so many things because it objectively or physically harms them, other than the sex” and continue: “Children are forbidden to smoke cigarette, drink alcohol, driving, or voting etc. Suddenly the entire anti-pedo podium start applauding without understanding the basic stupidity of this comparison.

Let us take the matters of cigarette and alcohol. I totally agree smoking and alcohol drinking can cause significant body harms and health problems not only to the children also to the adults, basically because the health science proves it. Therefore, the children should be prohibited from indulging into such activities. However, the analogical comparison to tabaco and alcohol to sex is blatantly stupid. If the sexual activity in children cause grave harms and health problems like the tobacco and alcohol, then we should enforce strict discipline on children to prevent them from doing it, like we do in the case of tabaco and alcohol etc. However, our society don’t do it in the matters of child sex because there is no basic scientific evidence that proves children enjoying normal sexual pleasures could harm them in any way. Let me stop it in here because I want this objective fact about sex in children to sink deeply into those anti-pedo heads before I start my next presentation on this child sexual consent matter.

[PorcelainLark]

Basically, it's a false dichotomy (i.e. either AMSC is exploitative or it isn't). Saying some or even most of AMSC is exploitative, isn't enough to justify the claim that all AMSC is immoral, yet society acts as though it is with absurd consequences.