As promised, I am sharing the second segment of my preliminary theoretical draft titled:
“Pedophilia Criminal Offence Built on Morally Bankrupt Western Pseudosciences.”
This segment includes sections 1 to 10, each comprising a series of paragraphs under distinct subheadings. I will continue to post the remaining parts segment by segment in due course. The full paper made available in
https://anticorruptionfight.blogspot.com/One of the other main reason for posting this whole paper in segment by segment in this forum is that, I hope the records will remain even if they take down my blog for whatever reasons.
1. INTRODUCTION
Pedophilia and incest are often regarded as complicit and universally condemned sexual behaviours, particularly in the Western world today. However, historically, both practices, especially, pedophilia or prepubescent adult sexual bonding in the form of marriages played a crucial role in human evolution and survival due to their high mortality rates (compared to modern standard). Throughout much of human cultural traditional historical records early-age sexual relations considered as necessary and endorsed by all as essential for normal reproduction and wellbeing of the individuals and the society as whole.
The modern-day moral condemnation of these behaviours is relatively a recent development shaped by Socio-economic, political and legal dynamical powerplay in the larger societal frameworks. Due to its enigmatic moral or ethical concerns this scientific study of adolescent-adult sexual attractions and affectionate consensual relations remain highly prejudiced and restricted. It prevails in every mainstream print, digital, and social media platforms as well as in academic literature and journal publications. There is a notable disregard for objective, reliable research on this subject, explained in the coming pages of this study. This widespread intellectual neglect prevents a deeper, evidence-based understanding of the complexities surrounding adolescent sexuality.
As a result, a significant barrier exists to conducting open-minded, unbiased research on prepubescent and adolescent sexual behaviours. The lack of scientific inquiry into this topic makes it difficult to answer key questions objectively, leaving discussions dominated by emotional moral and intellectual biases and prejudices rather than empirical evidence. In this study, I aim to explore prepubescent to adolescent sexual behaviours and expressions, singled out as "pedophilia" in Western discourse—with a focus on both pubescent girls and boys, broadly categorized as "children" under 18. This study will attempt to critically examine historical, biological, and psychological perspectives on this subject while challenging the prevailing biases and moral taboos that obstruct serious academic discussion.
II. Historical Perspectives of Human Sexuality
2. ANCIENT SEXUALITY RECORDS IN EARLY HUMAN HISTORY
To understand the evolution of human sexual norms, it is essential to examine early recorded historical texts that shaped societal attitudes toward sexuality. One of the oldest religious texts, the Sumerian Kesh Temple Hymn (circa 2600 BCE), provides insight into early ritualistic sexual traditions. Another significant Sumerian literary work, the Epic of Gilgamesh, depicts the temple priestess Shamhat engaging in sexual relations with the wild Enkidu, illustrating how sexuality was integrated into religious and cultural narratives.
The Kahun Gynecological Papyrus (circa 1800 BCE) from ancient Egypt offers one of the earliest medical perspectives on women’s reproductive health and sexuality. Meanwhile, the Code of Hammurabi (circa 1750 BCE) addressed sexual conduct through legal and moral frameworks, reflecting the interplay between law, ethics, and religion. These texts demonstrate that sexuality was deeply embedded in the religious, medical, and legal structures of early civilizations, shaping the foundations of human sexual norms.
3. MANUSMRITI (CIRCA 1000 BCE),
Ancient Vedic literature, most notably the Manusmriti (circa 1000 BCE), explicitly advocates that the ideal age of marriage for girls should be between 8 and 10 years, a range that aligns with the onset of puberty. Similarly, ancient Chinese rites and dynastic records suggest that marriage was traditionally expected to take place around puberty, although the references are less explicit than those found in Vedic texts. The Code of Hammurabi and other ancient Mesopotamian legal texts do not specify a particular age for marriage. This omission may indicate that they saw no need to legislate what was already determined by nature of puberty itself which was widely recognized as the defining marker of sexual maturity, the legal age for marriage. Across these civilizations, the notion of prohibition on childhood sexuality as wrong and harmful on social or moral grounds, did not exist as it does today; instead, the biological and physical development of prepubescent into puberty as sexual maturity largely dictated social and legal expectations regarding marriage and sexual relationships.
4. HISTORICAL CONTEXT EARLY MEDIEVAL TIMES EUROPE AGE OF MARRIAGES
Throughout history, almost all societies normalized sexual relations around the age of puberty, often between 10 to 13 for girls. In ancient Rome and Greece, girls married shortly after puberty, with examples like Julia the Elder in Rome and Spartan practices. Medieval Europe saw child marriages among nobility, such as Margaret Beaufort in England (1455) married at 12 and gave birth at the age of 13 to King Henry VII, while the Church set marriage ages at 12 for girls and 14 for boys. In Islamic societies, early marriages were common, exemplified by Aisha’s marriage to Muhammad, and the Ottoman Empire used child marriages for political alliances. Hindu and South Asian traditions promoted child marriage to ensure purity and familial ties, while imperial China and feudal Japan married girls in their early teens for familial and social stability. Native American tribes and African societies also practiced early marriage as part of cultural rites. In Renaissance Europe and colonial America, girls often married in their mid-teens, reflecting societal norms. Throughout the past human history late marriage for girls were exceptions rather than normal social practices. These historical traditions, rooted in cultural, economic, and social contexts, contrast sharply with modern understandings of child rights and development, which universally condemn such practices today.
5. RISKS AND CONSEQUENCES OF FIRST-TIME SEX AND FIRST PREGNANCIES AT HISTORICAL TIMES
Let us Draw some common sense logic and historical lessons from our ancestors about the human sexual relations at the adolescent age of puberty around 12 years. It is reasonable to infer that our ancestors, especially foremothers, were aware of the risks associated with the first pregnancies for the girls. Almost all of our foremothers likely experienced these realities in firsthand. The anxieties of pleasure anticipations during a young woman's first sexual experience, it was a significant event, in their life often socially linked to the concept of virginity. It is important to emphasize that our grandmothers few generation back, most of whom later became midwives, started their sexual relations with their husbands during their adolescent years without any such inherent harms damage such as Neurodevelopmental Disruption, Distorted Sexual Development, Loss of Autonomy and Consent, Guilt and Shame, Social Dysfunction as listed in the modern pedophilia offence legislations to make it a heinous child rape crime. Through the lived experience, they understood both the physical and emotional complexities of sexual relations, as well as the profound mixture of fear, pain and joy surrounding childbirth. Despite the inherent dangers of pregnancies at their time of history, which we could never imaging from our modern day healthcare safety standards, having the comfort of every sexual pleasure with any such pregnancy risk. However back then, they accepted both the hardships and the happiness , pains and pleasures of marriage and motherhood as integral parts of life.
If one were to interview our foremothers — those who had given birth one or two children by the age of 18 and ask whether they felt their lives were destroyed by marrying at 12 or 13, most would likely protest. They might insist they had a fulfilling married life and argue that being forced to wait until 18 to marry would have devastated their lives by delaying what they considered essential for the well-being in life. In fact, until the 19th century in Europe women who were not married before 18 years were considered as surpassed their marriageable age and called “Spinsters”. At those times, other than pregnancies another significant risk involved in sexual activity before the modern age was contracting sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). However, confining sexual activity within marriage was seen as a way to prevent the spread of such infections, reinforcing the importance of marital boundaries as both a personal and societal safeguard.
6. POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE OUTCOMES OF HUMAN SEXUAL RELATIONS THROUGHOUT HISTORY
Let us conduct some more detailed independent study to highlight the broader positive and negative outcomes of human sexual relations throughout history, acknowledging that our foremothers and forefathers often began sexual relations in their early adolescent years. Beyond the intense sexual pleasure experienced during intercourse, the primary outcome has been pregnancy — a reality unchanged from the past to today. Human pregnancies generally fall into two categories: desirable and undesirable. Desirable pregnancies, most often occurring within the bounds of marriage, have historically been viewed as important for the growth and survival of the families and community. Conversely, undesirable pregnancies frequently resulted from sexual activities outside marriage, such as adultery, prostitution, rape. To prevent these, strict religious, traditional and cultural norms established, with stringent criminal laws specially against adultery serving as deterrents. This historical perspective reveals how human societies have long regulated sexual behaviours, distinguishing between what was considered right and good and what was deemed wrong and harmful, in an effort to balance personal desires and societal stability.
7. EARLY MARRIAGE AS A SAFEGUARD FOR MORAL AND SOCIAL INTEGRITY
The traditional belief was that early marriage safeguarded a girl's social, moral, and familial integrity. It was thought that marrying young would deter girls from engaging in inappropriate behavior driven by natural adolescent curiosity and perceived heightened sexual attractions and desires, which might otherwise lead them to seek illicit relationships outside marriage. By transferring responsibility from parents to husbands, early marriage ensured a girl's safety and honor. This historical context challenges the modern Western perspective of stigmatization of adult and adolescent age sexual behaviors, labelling it as pedophilia offence, is not an eternal moral absolute but a relatively recent development influenced by changing cultural and ideological norms.
8 ONLY MARRIAGE GIVES MEN AND WOMEN RIGHT TO HAVE SEX AND SIRE CHILDREN
Before modernity, marriage between a man and woman was the sole arbiter of legitimate sexual relations, devoid of the modern concept of consensual sex. It sanctioned sexual intimacy from a young age and ensured that the offspring bore the husband’s lineage, not an outsider. Women, physically weaker, risked exploitation by external males, prompting fathers to guard them in youth, brothers to share this honour, and husbands to assume it post-marriage, with sons protecting them in old age. Thus, women were perpetually under male oversight and protection. This system guaranteed familial purity and resource control, a cornerstone of ancient societies. Unlike today’s focus on consent, marriage alone validated sex, reflecting a rigid structure now upended. This historical norm in which prepubescent unions promoted flourished and thrived basically clashes with modern enigmatic belief that adolescent children below 18 incapables of consent therefore pedophilia a criminal offence, suggests its criminalization stems not from harm but comes from Victorian age patriarchal family property protection framework.
9 ANCESTRAL PRACTICES OF NATURAL PUBESCENT SEXUAL RELATIONS JUDGED BY MODERN WESTERN STANDARDS
Western medical and legal authorities today classify pedophilia as both a pathological disorder and an inherently harmful criminal act, supported by the so called extensive evidence demonstrating its severe and lasting impact on children. Medical assessments reveal that pedophilia inflicts profound psychological distress, often resulting in conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and suicidal tendencies. Beyond emotional harm, it can impair cognitive function, leaving minors with long-term trauma that disrupts their emotional and mental development and leads to severe social dysfunction. Legal experts assert that these effects, stemming from disrupted emotional and cognitive growth which can persist well into adulthood, creating a lifelong burden. Justice systems echo this stance, viewing child sexual abuse, including pedophilia, as among the most heinous form of sexual crimes as child rape. Courts blindly believe in the doctrines of its devastating consequences: chronic mental health disorders, profound social impairment, and an elevated risk of future victimization. Consequently, stringent laws criminalize and harshly penalize pedophilic acts, aiming to deter offenders and protect vulnerable children from irreversible harm.
10. CASTING DAMNING JUDGEMENT ON OUR ANCESTORS AS PEDOPHILE CHILD RAPIST
These contemporary constructs of pedophilia crime, defined by Western medical and legal authorities, implicitly casts a damning judgment on the sexual relations of our ancestors. Across thousands of generations and tens of billions of individuals, human history reveals that our forebears—grandfathers and grandmothers—commonly married and bore children during pubescent years led natural healthy life and died. By today’s standards, this would label them as pedophiles and child rapists, suggesting they were indifferent to their children’s well-being. The argument follows that they coerced prepubescent girls into marriages with older males, forcing sexual relations. This power balance between in the sexual relation between the child and adult constituting child rape resulted in childhood pregnancies and childbirth. According to modern authorities, nearly all our ancestors, our grandfathers a few generations removed, would be deemed sexually deviant pervert pedophiles, while our grandmothers, complicit in these unions, all due to a pathological disorder and its disorders mentioned in earlier pages, passed down through generations. This narrative implies that all of them in general continually committed raping children until they reached the arbitrary age of 18, perhaps oblivious to the supposed harm they inflicted.
