PorcelainLark wrote: Tue Oct 28, 2025 1:48 am
Maybe I misread the article but I didn't see them talk about any artificial PIM.
The earlier article (linked in the copy) suggests the headline is clickbait, and this is the case, but it is not fully clear whose "explicit content" was shared due to the poor wording.
Given the presence of decoys and their inability to share explicit content, it can be argued they encourage "predators" to pressurize girls into sharing their photos to prove they are real. In that case, there would be an ethical as well as a results-based argument for expanding the arsenal to explicit AI porn, and with Australian LEOs now able to share the real thing, I do wonder what is holding them back.