Mu Conversations: Is a MAP-Zoophile alliance a possibility?

[Jim Burton]

Despite the massive theoretical differences, a lot of the anti-MAPs are also anti-Zoo, anti-Necro, anti-sex.

I suppose this is because theory plays no part in the anti-sex performance. It's an afterthought.

[Fragment]

Antis will find some excuse to be against the sexual practices they find gross, no matter how illogical.

The same braindead cunts that talk about “animals can’t consent to sex” will chow down on a hamburger as if animals can consent to becoming fucking mince meat.

I’m not interested in bestiality at all. But animals are property, so you can do whatever you want with them, whether it be turning them into a fucking sausage, or fucking them with your sausage. It’s not god damn rocket science.

[G@yWad69]

Hell yeah! I love my fellow big 3s! I support biastophiles(as long as they are anti c) necros, zoos, and incest lovers. I am also attracted to some animals so I would be a hypocrite if I was anti zoo.

[G@yWad69]

Antis will find some excuse to be against the sexual practices they find gross, no matter how illogical.

The same braindead cunts that talk about “animals can’t consent to sex” will chow down on a hamburger as if animals can consent to becoming fucking mince meat.

I’m not interested in bestiality at all. But animals are property, so you can do whatever you want with them, whether it be turning them into a fucking sausage, or fucking them with your sausage. It’s not god damn rocket science.

You hit the nail right on the head Fragment. Animals can consent to being slaughtered and murdered, having their decaying flesh worn for fashion, being hunted for sport, being eaten, being forciblely bred with other animals, being exploited for slave labour and being expieremented on, but cant consent to getting a handjob?? What cow is going “Oh yeah its fine if you force me into a tiny pen my enitre short life, standing in piles of my own shit, eating food my stomach cant even digest, forcibley breed me nonstop until I die and then slaughter me, eat me, wear my rotting flesh for fashion but if you play with my cowussy I will be traumatized for life and never forgive you and need therapy”- I-what. And I gaurntee you all anti zoos support the meat/animal exploration indistry in one way or another. And they cant even use the excuse “but I have to eat meat/buy eggs/wear makeup/wear leather” because you literally dont?? Veganism is a thing, you are supporting the torture and slaughter of living animals soley for your own bodily pleasure, just like how I support freaky zoos sticking their hotdog into pigussy for their own bodily pleasure.

Its just as stupid as how people who are against AMSC, giving children bodily pleasure, because it “hurts children”, then turn around and beat chilrdren, causing them bodily pain, but its perfectly ok because of some bullshit “at least its not sexual” hypocrisy. Like giving a kid a handjob is more abusive and “traumatizing” than brutally beating the ever loving shit out of them, or giving a pig a handjob is worse than keeping them locked up in small cages, violently slaughtering them and eating their flesh. Whats so evil about sexual pleasure to these people?? I swear these people would support Ted Bundy levels of murder and torture on children and animals because “at least its not sexual” but advocate for the death penalty towards anyone who even looks at a kid or animal with lustful eyes. Us pedos and zoos are in this bullshit together, it only makes sense for us to be allies. One time in highschool a teacher told me how she beat her four year old little boy so hard he shit himself. And i bet you that same women would be violently agaisnt a pedophile kissing his lips because it would “hurt the kid”. Its all projection at the end of the day, only antis would manage to turn loving children and sex, one of the most natural forms of expressing love, into “abuse”, and beating and eating children and animals into “love”.

[BLueRibbon]

Antis will find some excuse to be against the sexual practices they find gross, no matter how illogical.

The same braindead cunts that talk about “animals can’t consent to sex” will chow down on a hamburger as if animals can consent to becoming fucking mince meat.

I’m not interested in bestiality at all. But animals are property, so you can do whatever you want with them, whether it be turning them into a fucking sausage, or fucking them with your sausage. It’s not god damn rocket science.

Its just as stupid as how people who are against AMSC, giving children bodily pleasure, because it “hurts children”, then turn around and beat chilrdren, causing them bodily pain, but its perfectly ok because of some bullshit “at least its not sexual” hypocrisy. Like giving a kid a handjob is more abusive and “traumatizing” than brutally beating the ever loving shit out of them, or giving a pig a handjob is worse than keeping them locked up in small cages, violently slaughtering them and eating their flesh. Whats so evil about sexual pleasure to these people??

It's because sex hysteria is a residual of Abrahamic religious beliefs, and MAP hysteria its product. When your arguments are rooted in magic, logic is completely irrelevant.

[G@yWad69]

Antis will find some excuse to be against the sexual practices they find gross, no matter how illogical.

The same braindead cunts that talk about “animals can’t consent to sex” will chow down on a hamburger as if animals can consent to becoming fucking mince meat.

I’m not interested in bestiality at all. But animals are property, so you can do whatever you want with them, whether it be turning them into a fucking sausage, or fucking them with your sausage. It’s not god damn rocket science.

Its just as stupid as how people who are against AMSC, giving children bodily pleasure, because it “hurts children”, then turn around and beat chilrdren, causing them bodily pain, but its perfectly ok because of some bullshit “at least its not sexual” hypocrisy. Like giving a kid a handjob is more abusive and “traumatizing” than brutally beating the ever loving shit out of them, or giving a pig a handjob is worse than keeping them locked up in small cages, violently slaughtering them and eating their flesh. Whats so evil about sexual pleasure to these people??

It's because sex hysteria is a residual of Abrahamic religious beliefs, and MAP hysteria its product. When your arguments are rooted in magic, logic is completely irrelevant.

The dangerous and magical properties of sex, a sin so inherently violent and evil that beating, neglecting, torturing, screaming, killing, eating, and experimenting on children and animals is perfectly acceptable but giving them a willing orgasm makes you basically Satan or something. We will look back on the 21st centurary the exact same way we look back on the 1800s, as a society full of puritan sex facist hystericals who think willing and mutually agreed upon sexual pleasure is a worse fate than dearh