Despite the massive theoretical differences, a lot of the anti-MAPs are also anti-Zoo, anti-Necro, anti-sex.
I suppose this is because theory plays no part in the anti-sex performance. It's an afterthought.
Mu Conversations: Is a MAP-Zoophile alliance a possibility?
- Jim Burton
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm
Re: Mu Conversations: Is a MAP-Zoophile alliance a possibility?
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
Online
Re: Mu Conversations: Is a MAP-Zoophile alliance a possibility?
Antis will find some excuse to be against the sexual practices they find gross, no matter how illogical.
The same braindead cunts that talk about “animals can’t consent to sex” will chow down on a hamburger as if animals can consent to becoming fucking mince meat.
I’m not interested in bestiality at all. But animals are property, so you can do whatever you want with them, whether it be turning them into a fucking sausage, or fucking them with your sausage. It’s not god damn rocket science.
The same braindead cunts that talk about “animals can’t consent to sex” will chow down on a hamburger as if animals can consent to becoming fucking mince meat.
I’m not interested in bestiality at all. But animals are property, so you can do whatever you want with them, whether it be turning them into a fucking sausage, or fucking them with your sausage. It’s not god damn rocket science.
If only some people can have it, that's not happiness. That's just nonsense. Happiness is something anyone can have.
怪物
Interviews:
1: https://fstube.net/w/4bmc3B97iHsUA8rgyUv21S
3: https://fstube.net/w/xd1o7ctj2s51v97EVZhwHs
怪物
Interviews:
1: https://fstube.net/w/4bmc3B97iHsUA8rgyUv21S
3: https://fstube.net/w/xd1o7ctj2s51v97EVZhwHs