Hoo boy! I disagree super strongly with that!ASpiritualMAP wrote: Mon Aug 11, 2025 6:32 pm The fact traumatic memories function differently from ordinary memory is pretty much settled science.
That whole "recovered memory" stuff is bogus. Please don't try to revive that nonsense trend. I have not read this book you're quoting, but even in just that passage you presented, I see major flaws. The big one is that, like so many others, they're assuming that EVERY sexual experience was SO TRAGIC AND DEVASTATING THAT THERE'S NO WAY THEY COULD EVER FORGET ABOUT IT IN THIER ENTIRE LIVES!!! And that no other possibility exists.
Where as I can explain this whole thing much easier by saying the sexual experience must not have been that memorable. Or they've just long since moved on. I'm not saying that's always the case, but it's a possibility. I would even say it's very likely. This applies even despite the fact that they took their sample from hospitals. After all, you can end up in the hospital even when you're not physically injured. And even then, do you remember every single time you wound up in the hospital and what led up to it? Maybe you do. But not everyone will. I certainly don't.