16/12: Pro-Reform's position on AMSC

Share essays written by MAPs and our allies. You are welcome to promote your own off-board writing. If you want to write your own mini essays on our board, please use the 'Theorycrafting' sub-forum.
Grunko
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 12:42 pm

Re: 16/12: Pro-Reform's position on AMSC

Post by Grunko »

It would be nice to also acknowledge that grooming, exploitation isn’t always perpetrated by the adult/someone older. Kids/teenagers can groom, exploitation and take advantage of other minors and/or adults. Sometimes the older partner may be more innocent and niave and the younger person (minor) could have more knowledge or can be very manipulative.
The 16/12 proposal should acknowledge this.
I know someone who at around 11-14 claimed they were groomed, exploited and taken advantage by someone of very similar age.
RocketRack
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed May 28, 2025 8:39 pm

Re: 16/12: Pro-Reform's position on AMSC

Post by RocketRack »

Grunko wrote: Thu Jun 19, 2025 4:00 pm It would be nice to also acknowledge that grooming, exploitation isn’t always perpetrated by the adult/someone older. Kids/teenagers can groom, exploitation and take advantage of other minors and/or adults. Sometimes the older partner may be more innocent and niave and the younger person (minor) could have more knowledge or can be very manipulative.
The 16/12 proposal should acknowledge this.
I know someone who at around 11-14 claimed they were groomed, exploited and taken advantage by someone of very similar age.
Sorry for my ignorance on this topic! But what does the 'AM' part of AMSC stand for? I guess SC is sexual contact? I have heard in the news of kids doing pretty nasty stuff to each other tbh... sharing nudes without consent, rating their peers etc. Kids can be hella mean sometimes :(
User avatar
PorcelainLark
Posts: 735
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm

Re: 16/12: Pro-Reform's position on AMSC

Post by PorcelainLark »

RocketRack wrote: Fri Jun 27, 2025 3:42 pm
Grunko wrote: Thu Jun 19, 2025 4:00 pm It would be nice to also acknowledge that grooming, exploitation isn’t always perpetrated by the adult/someone older. Kids/teenagers can groom, exploitation and take advantage of other minors and/or adults. Sometimes the older partner may be more innocent and niave and the younger person (minor) could have more knowledge or can be very manipulative.
The 16/12 proposal should acknowledge this.
I know someone who at around 11-14 claimed they were groomed, exploited and taken advantage by someone of very similar age.
Sorry for my ignorance on this topic! But what does the 'AM' part of AMSC stand for? I guess SC is sexual contact? I have heard in the news of kids doing pretty nasty stuff to each other tbh... sharing nudes without consent, rating their peers etc. Kids can be hella mean sometimes :(
Adult-Minor Sexual Contact. So it's inclusive of sexual acts other that just statutory rape. There's a glossary here:
https://www.map-union.org/encyclopedia/glossary
User avatar
Curson
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:04 am

Re: 16/12: Pro-Reform's position on AMSC

Post by Curson »

Does anyone think this will ever change in our lifetime? Acceptance of what the norm used to be?
Am I not simply a human being just like you? But out of your norm.
Online
User avatar
Jim Burton
Posts: 1067
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm

Re: 16/12: Pro-Reform's position on AMSC

Post by Jim Burton »

Make America Fertile Again?
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap

Adult-attracted gay man; writer. Attraction to minors is typical variation of human sexuality.
Post Reply