Antifa is known for preventing conservatives libertarians and centrist from giving speeches on college campuses such as in the case of Yaron Brooke, Sargon of Akkad Milo and more. On college campuses they will preemptively plan a disruption scene when its time for a center right or beyond speaker. Antifa makes the case that "would you really die fighting for what someone has to say if that person would kill you?" and make the case that unlimited hate speech leads to violence. They often cite a nazi bar principle how if center of right folks aren't kicked out of organizations they will become dominated by """FASCIST""". And their principle of fascism is anyone who slightly disagrees with them on transgender politics. The core principle is that freedom of speech for people they disagree is just code name for violence against vulnerable racial and sexual minorities. Remember that.
Now moving on to the FBI's similarities. In 2012 their CP investigation division got rebranded as VCAC (Violent crimes agent children) acronym with the 2012 FBI making an official statement in 2012 that child porn is a violent crime. Even though federally under law it is not considered that. At least not yet. They make that personal declaration on that, and Kash Patel FBI director of today still stands by it calling CSAM posession alone a violent crime here.
source:
https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/20 ... 6555974054
"President Trump’s law enforcement team led by this FBI is conducting the most aggressive violent crimes against children takedowns in United States history - and we’re not slowing down. "
Kash Patel bragged about the Arizona US Atttorney's deemed success - giving some of the longest sentences in modern US history to internet only CSAM defendants totaling 10,000 years for 50 individuals who lacked contact offenses without federal early release eligibility. This goes WAY BEYOND SENTENCES FOR VIOLENT RAPE IN LOCAL STATES. and Remember ""CSAM""" is a weasel word that ranges from anything from leotard/swimwear photos of kids to brutal rape of them. Where only the latter is mentioned in police reports, and remember each image file of non nude non sexually posing and non explicit kids can be 5-20 years each - and federal law and some states are even harsher.
My point is Patel labeling CP a violent crime is a HUGE FUCKING STUPID ASS MISTAKE. Its impossible to logically justify that statement, no matter how strong you play devil's advocate with that idea it won't work. That is inexcusable! Of course there is a illegal child rape media economy on dark net but its peanuts compared to drugs and most of it is recycled horror media from the 2000s, rarely newly produced.
Sure Patel could accurately say
a subset of CSAM like paying for 764 like torture network content is a violent crime
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/764_(organization)
That would be extremely accurate. and I'd agree there - but no, that is not what he professes alone. He implied ALL sharing of image files of kids in erotic ways is exclusively a violent crime and pushes a violent economy. Thus he believes sharing or viewing pictures of kids in bikinis is violence, that puts him in the same boat as Antifa for saying free expression is violence. But perhaps worse because Antifa does not kick down people's doors and arrest them for pictures of kids in swimwear and lock them in cages for life.
- So understand my point -
1) Antifa believes that free speech they don't like leads to violence
2) The FBI and Kash Patel believes image/video files of kids in swimwear and leotards they don't like leads to violence
Rather its violent totalitarian presenting government agents banning swimwear clothing media
Or college students jumping on diner tables with red and black flags demanding censorship of a libertarian speaker.
Both claim they are doing this in self defense/greater good to combat violence and these lunatics believe their own bullshit. People who download non hardcore CP can face much more time in US prison then violent rapist in theory - and sometimes in practice. The names of these government agencies don't even reflect the reality of the crime like 92% of CP being self generated https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-report-2023/
The rest of the video linked from the X post features propaganda on how the US Government is out to get """child predators""" who may be just looking at pictures of kids in swimwear or twerking/dancing in the privacy of their own home and do the worst imaginable to them - in the tweet Patel said he will do everything in his power to protect America's children from us - the deemed evil outgroup.It looks to me like Kash Patel is trying to blur the line between violent 764 terrorist networks and other groups of people who look at illegal pictures of minors for whatever reason. What's the point of a legal gradiance if child torture crimes and bikini pics are punished exactly the same with life sentences?
The X.com video released by the FBI on X is dripping with propaganda to make the user think all CSAM is tied to violence and abduction. Far from the reality of that being an extreme exception. It is flaring with child protection instincts and us vs them thinkng about the deemed righteous battling the outgroup.
The video Patel posted shows visual dramatizations of children tied up, in fear, and rescues of kids running back to their parents arms, raid scenes and prison dramatization. It gives the viewer the impression of extremely tough on crime mentality against pure evil monsters that hardly count as human.
As we know neuroscience shows Oxytocin contributes to dehumanization as it causes humans to feel extreme compassion and cuddly love for the ingroup and nothing but contempt for hated outgroups.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UggdBeC5Qs
Sound familar?
For a normal person watching Patel's video they would assume that pedophiles are all sadist and directly tied to sexual violence and abductions. Any normie watching this video will assume the FBI is rescuing kids from violent crimes 24/7 and applaud the 40,000 victim match claims. not knowing that legally speaking identifying can mean SO MUCH MOREE. the FBI can identify photos from a junior idol/east European child model sets, swimwear shopping catalogs or kids twerking on social media from their origin and add that to the 40,000 number tally
Every image of those unharmed kids matched counts - including all the duplicate images of a very popular leotard maid dress junior idol girl named Laura and her play pal Valensiya. Each duplicate of these very common circulated junior idol girl media files counts as an FBI victim match to inflate the numbers. Normies will think a 40,000 victim match means 40,000 kids rescued when in reality its a bunch of unharmed social media kids, swimwear shopping catalogs. junior idols and duplicates of Laura and Valensiya. If only we can get the real crime victims without duplicates. That would be fair.
Over all I can conclude by saying I really don't care if they go after dark net child rape websites and hack them like Lolita City and KidFlix or sadistic telegram groups - I've never touched websites like those in my life. But jesus christ they are treating image boards with special needs adults posting swimwear/maid dress girls exactly the same. Patel knows exactly what he is doing. He is brainwashing the public into thinking all CP is adjacent to violent 764 crime and of course his narrative is nothing more then child protection instincts I discuss here.
Yup, child protection instincts we inherited from natural selection are the reason this bullshit happens in the first place.
https://forum.map-union.org/viewtopic.php?p=19529
The bottom line is if 90%-92% of CP is self generated (according to IWF) and only 1%-5% is hardcore (Level A), we need to know
regarding hardcore, which is consenting teenagers vs prepubescents being sex contacted?
and if the prepubescents are being harmed in proven ways?
and how bad is it/is violence present?
and how much of self generated media is coercion/deception and how much is "bedroom dancing kids"?
and what percent of CP is swimwear catalogs and child model stuff that many of us see EVERYWHERE?
We don't know all the data but all signs is pointing to self generated being the most common and non nude child modeling being much higher then adult child sex media, with sex with teens outnumbering prepubescent sex. Suggesting a safe world with few exceptions. The exception is the recent Matt Eskies baby video anti Alex Rosen discussed or child rape media produced by independent fathers that Tim Tebow discussed. So of course I will acknowledge the exceptions.
I don't have data to go further. I pushed AI for all it would give - and sometimes it hallucinates and the loons at the FBI and NCMEC aren't going to give us those facts because child protection instincts over ride it + comfy government jobs. One day the truth will come out. Girl Love Libertarion will be characterized by free speech radicalism - neuroscience on disgust - firey debates - and anti authoritarianism. If we somehow force then to release just the facts it could change everything. IWF's data and NCMEC's claim of AI CP exploding can be used against antis.
just trust me from personal knowledge that 1) self generated kids dancing and 2) bikini photos and 3) junior idol laura and valensiya severely outnumber child rape media and deceptive grooming photos - child rape media likely circulates on the worst corners of onion and p2p networks, but is outnumbered by photosharing websites, forums and isolated webpages/groups sharing borderline media of kids - sites which ban hardcore CP of prepubescents while still allowing bikini photos and the likes beyond legal limits.
That is inside information you are never getting from NCMEC/FBI.