Contact with infants
Contact with infants
My view on contact with infants who would have no concept of consent is a difficult issue. Personally, I wouldn't necessarily approve of contact is these particular cases but I don't necessarily see anything wrong with not telling them about the contract when they are older either.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
Re: Contact with infants
Even nonhuman animals can show consent and a lack of consent so speech isn't necessarily an absolute form of communication. Yes doesn't always mean yes and no doesn't always mean no. Body language and vocal contour are crucial indicators of one's true feelings. That being said, the body can remember things the conscious memory can't so if it was highly unconformable or painful that could mess them up for life. However some interaction could even be enjoyable for some.
38, female. Writer, mediocre artist, and total sub!
Westernized society hates youth. MAPs are the cure. Youth are NOT slaves. They are our future and we must fight for their freedom.
Westernized society hates youth. MAPs are the cure. Youth are NOT slaves. They are our future and we must fight for their freedom.
Re: Contact with infants
A baby who is caressed and touched in a simple way and who is given pleasant things, even without speaking, will show through their actions that they are enjoying what is being done to them. If it is unpleasant, they will naturally show it through gestures or sounds. Laughter and crying are signs, within what is being done to them, signs of good or bad things. So necessarily, as has already been said here, speech cannot be something that can only say yes or no, they are signs of agreement or disagreement. Sounds can also demonstrate, don't forget, the body responds to stimuli, and this response can be visible.
Live life to the full.
Pegasus265000@protonmail.com
Pegasus265000@protonmail.com
Re: Contact with infants
It would also be the case for people with very low IQ, extremely bad memory loss or weak verbal skills.Pegasus wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:20 am A baby who is caressed and touched in a simple way and who is given pleasant things, even without speaking, will show through their actions that they are enjoying what is being done to them. If it is unpleasant, they will naturally show it through gestures or sounds. Laughter and crying are signs, within what is being done to them, signs of good or bad things. So necessarily, as has already been said here, speech cannot be something that can only say yes or no, they are signs of agreement or disagreement. Sounds can also demonstrate, don't forget, the body responds to stimuli, and this response can be visible.
My views on corporal punishment are that I believe that it should be subject to general assault laws.
I would suggest that contact where there is no knowledge of contact or not, expressed by whichever way of communication should be treated similar. I would not regard it as sexual assault.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
-
trannypuppy
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2026 11:50 pm
Re: Contact with infants
Absolutely agree! Consent isn't all verbalPegasus wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:20 am A baby who is caressed and touched in a simple way and who is given pleasant things, even without speaking, will show through their actions that they are enjoying what is being done to them. If it is unpleasant, they will naturally show it through gestures or sounds. Laughter and crying are signs, within what is being done to them, signs of good or bad things. So necessarily, as has already been said here, speech cannot be something that can only say yes or no, they are signs of agreement or disagreement. Sounds can also demonstrate, don't forget, the body responds to stimuli, and this response can be visible.
trannypuppy: ftm autistic zoo map :3
AoA: 0+ , peak AoA 2-7
trannypuppy on proton, pls send me an email if you want to talk!
AoA: 0+ , peak AoA 2-7
trannypuppy on proton, pls send me an email if you want to talk!
Re: Contact with infants
Of course. For example some people with autism are not verbal. Verbal communication is important for me though.trannypuppy wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 12:42 amAbsolutely agree! Consent isn't all verbalPegasus wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:20 am A baby who is caressed and touched in a simple way and who is given pleasant things, even without speaking, will show through their actions that they are enjoying what is being done to them. If it is unpleasant, they will naturally show it through gestures or sounds. Laughter and crying are signs, within what is being done to them, signs of good or bad things. So necessarily, as has already been said here, speech cannot be something that can only say yes or no, they are signs of agreement or disagreement. Sounds can also demonstrate, don't forget, the body responds to stimuli, and this response can be visible.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
Re: Contact with infants
I am not here to judge nor am I the enemy, so please take what I’m about to say lightly.
I personally think contact with infants is wrong. I like ages 6 and up so who the hell am I to say anything. Anti’s are gonna look at us the same anyway, but I do think like everything in life there should be a limit (waiting for the wise guy to say “yea and it’s 18 years old” lol).
Seriously though, they can’t consent to anything. I think trying to justify your stance on contact with an infant is wild. I think those who are pro-c with infants are so frustrated that you’ll think of anything to justify it.
I personally think contact with infants is wrong. I like ages 6 and up so who the hell am I to say anything. Anti’s are gonna look at us the same anyway, but I do think like everything in life there should be a limit (waiting for the wise guy to say “yea and it’s 18 years old” lol).
Seriously though, they can’t consent to anything. I think trying to justify your stance on contact with an infant is wild. I think those who are pro-c with infants are so frustrated that you’ll think of anything to justify it.
Re: Contact with infants
I very rarely find infants attractive. I very rarely find elderly people attractive also but you seem to be advocating for an "age of consent", which is nonsense.msykm99 wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 4:27 am I am not here to judge nor am I the enemy, so please take what I’m about to say lightly.
I personally think contact with infants is wrong. I like ages 6 and up so who the hell am I to say anything. Anti’s are gonna look at us the same anyway, but I do think like everything in life there should be a limit (waiting for the wise guy to say “yea and it’s 18 years old” lol).
Seriously though, they can’t consent to anything. I think trying to justify your stance on contact with an infant is wild. I think those who are pro-c with infants are so frustrated that you’ll think of anything to justify it.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
- FairBlueLove
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2024 5:38 pm
Re: Contact with infants
I can think of a limit on the *kind* of contact, not on the age. 'Contact' is too general.msykm99 wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 4:27 am I am not here to judge nor am I the enemy, so please take what I’m about to say lightly.
I personally think contact with infants is wrong. I like ages 6 and up so who the hell am I to say anything. Anti’s are gonna look at us the same anyway, but I do think like everything in life there should be a limit (waiting for the wise guy to say “yea and it’s 18 years old” lol).
Seriously though, they can’t consent to anything. I think trying to justify your stance on contact with an infant is wild. I think those who are pro-c with infants are so frustrated that you’ll think of anything to justify it.
When society judges without understanding, it silences hearts that yearn for connection.
- OnionPetal
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2024 12:04 pm
Re: Contact with infants
I guess that rules out breastfeeding. And diaper changes.
Better leave them in complete isolation until they can consent to 'something,' whenever that might be...
In the absence of a clear blueprint, a good imagination is essential.
