Contact with infants
-
Scorchingwilde
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2025 10:40 am
Re: Contact with infants
There are nepio people who have kids and breastfeed them, I'm sure they're gotten some sexual pleasure from the process and I don't see any reason why that's wrong. I agree that the kind of contact does matter more than age, as does education around nonverbal signals when you're dealing with anyone who's nonverbal (which includes infants and young toddlers). And I'm not invested in this issue personally, because I'm really not into super young kids and infants give me a bit of the 'ick' (though I'd never dehumanize or treat one badly).
Internally agefluid/queer, very bi & trans
"One day, when it's safe... everyone will have always been against this." - Omar Akkad
"Be ruthless against systems and kind to people" - Michael J Brooks
"One day, when it's safe... everyone will have always been against this." - Omar Akkad
"Be ruthless against systems and kind to people" - Michael J Brooks
Re: Contact with infants
Honestly the replies seem wrong to me, most people laugh when their tickled, because their body makes them, not because they 100% like it, I disagree with sexual contact with infants, although sex is natural, theyre sponges, and growing up on sex can be damaging to their brain. Breastfeeding and changing diapers is different from sex, without those the infant will die due to starvation/extremely bad hygiene. I'm open to hear other opinions.
Pro-Contact AAM
Re: Contact with infants
Look, I respect your opinions on the subject. I am not here to change your mind. Anyway, Jimmy Savile certainly surrounded himself with some sexy children.Coyotehh wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:57 pm Honestly the replies seem wrong to me, most people laugh when their tickled, because their body makes them, not because they 100% like it, I disagree with sexual contact with infants, although sex is natural, theyre sponges, and growing up on sex can be damaging to their brain. Breastfeeding and changing diapers is different from sex, without those the infant will die due to starvation/extremely bad hygiene. I'm open to hear other opinions.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.
Re: Contact with infants
Thank you, I respect yours too, I have thought about it and I guess it really depends heavily on context, so I take back a little bit of my opinion, as I was thinking about doing it only for the infants body, not because you love them.DANAT4T wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 3:51 pm Look, I respect your opinions on the subject. I am not here to change your mind. Anyway, Jimmy Savile certainly surrounded himself with some sexy children.![]()
Pro-Contact AAM
Re: Contact with infants
I think we need to be real with ourselves for a second. I believe consent is when someone has a general idea of what they’re getting into. As I think about things more and more I think 10 years old is the right age of consent. The age of consent is not nonsense especially if we’re talking about actual sex.I very rarely find infants attractive. I very rarely find elderly people attractive also but you seem to be advocating for an "age of consent", which is nonsense.
Re: Contact with infants
You are referring to things mothers and fathers do to keep their child alive. Sexual contact has nothing to do with individual survival. You have to really think about what you are advocating for because it opens the door for so many other things. I don’t know your sexual preference but I’ll assume you are heterosexual. At your current age, would you allow another man to come up to you and just touch on you whenever he wants to? You can’t even answer this question because if you say yes then you’d allow just anything to happen. If you say no, then you just proved my point.I guess that rules out breastfeeding. And diaper changes.
Better leave them in complete isolation until they can consent to 'something,' whenever that might be...
