BBC reinstates paedo Eric Gill's statue behind a protective screen

A place to talk about news and non-academic articles related to MAPs.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jim Burton
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm

BBC reinstates paedo Eric Gill's statue behind a protective screen

Post by Jim Burton »

Critics will surely complain this is a present analogy for the corporation's past.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/ ... ive-screen
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
BLueRibbon
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:03 pm

Re: BBC reinstates paedo Eric Gill's statue behind a protective screen

Post by BLueRibbon »

Imagine focusing on this aspect of the legacy of prominent Britons, instead of the absolutely sinister history of global imperialistic genocide, enslavement, and mutilation.
Brian Ribbon, Mu Co-Founder and Strategist

A Call for the Abolition of Apathy
The Push
Pro-Reform
16/12
User avatar
Jim Burton
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm

Re: BBC reinstates paedo Eric Gill's statue behind a protective screen

Post by Jim Burton »

Oh, there are enough Britons who have been sold the lie of "accountability".

They sit behind their screens, shaking their fists at these "once great" "national institutions" of "are cuntrey!" such as the BBC, that have been "subverted" and "undermined" at some indeterminate point in history.

Most of these people live in crackerbox houses, which they have spent their entire lives obediently paying for. And I mean, really fucking nasty ones with faux-colonial double glazing, probably next to a motorway or something. They read the Daily Mail or Express, drive German cars (really badly) and shake their heads, tutting at "wokeness gone maaad".

All the while, they are completely oblivious to the fact that many British establishmentarians are massive paedos, and literally 0% GAF what some dead guy masturbated over, and don't want to think about it. They certainly don't care for the opinions of dumb masses who probably lived their entire lives believing their wealth is some kind of arbitrary number, and that they are just "less fortunate", as opposed idk, to being plain fucking stupid.
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
Post Reply