Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
- InfinityChild
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:39 pm
Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal? And is it wise strategically when talking with normies and trying to get them to view us better? I would assume the answer to the first is yes usually and the answer to the second is probably no usually. When among likeminded people I sometimes like doing that kinda stuff for fun and for community affirmation (in legal ways).
<3 Early 30s <3 Non-exclusive, but primarily a hebephile CL, peak ages 12-13 <3 Pronouns They/Them <3
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing super cute asian kids' legal?
i hope so because i'm obsessed.
I can't tell if these kids are real or AI.
i hope so because i'm obsessed.
I can't tell if these kids are real or AI.
-
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:03 pm
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
It's not illegal.
In real life, I would try expressing sympathy for MAPs, at least those who 'don't offend', without stating you are a MAP yourself. With very close friends and family, coming out can go either way. Mu's recent survey revealed that outcomes were usually positive or neutral, but not always.
In real life, I would try expressing sympathy for MAPs, at least those who 'don't offend', without stating you are a MAP yourself. With very close friends and family, coming out can go either way. Mu's recent survey revealed that outcomes were usually positive or neutral, but not always.
Brian Ribbon, Mu Co-Founder and Strategist
A Call for the Abolition of Apathy
The Push
Pro-Reform
16/12
A Call for the Abolition of Apathy
The Push
Pro-Reform
16/12
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
It depends on what you mean by "glorifying/ normalizing". I see "glorifying" as making something seem exceptional and special. It's kind of the opposite of normalizing, which is making something seem normal and common.And is it wise strategically when talking with normies and trying to get them to view us better?
Glorifying pedophilia just seems delusional. I see some posters on BL forums say things that make me cringe. "Boys are the most beautiful creatures in existence and antis are the ones with the problem because they can't see that."
I don't think BL is special. It's just another sexual orientation. There is a lot of pushback against it being seen as normal. But we should keep pushing the message that it is. We should take the moral high ground. People that paint us as monsters are the bigots. They are the ones in the wrong. Minor attraction's normalcy won't be accepted at first. But we need to keep on telling people that it is normal. Because it IS normal. Different, but normal. Just like homosexuality is different but normal.
Communications Officer: Mu. Exclusive hebephile BL.
"Everywhere I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous."
~Frankenstein
"Everywhere I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous."
~Frankenstein
Online
- RoosterDance
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2024 3:27 am
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
It's not illegal to be a pedophile, say your a pedophile, or even have an underage boy/girlfriend. But as soon as you have sex with them, you're the worst of criminals.
But even if you don't cross that line, people will always see you as a potential felon. Therefore it is perfectly legal, and even seen as respectable, to fire you from jobs, deny you any new ones, and also deny you any loans, housing, or insurance. You also won't be able to join the military.
Incidentally, I was pretty much able to copy and paste that from a summary of what happened to the gays.
But even if you don't cross that line, people will always see you as a potential felon. Therefore it is perfectly legal, and even seen as respectable, to fire you from jobs, deny you any new ones, and also deny you any loans, housing, or insurance. You also won't be able to join the military.
Incidentally, I was pretty much able to copy and paste that from a summary of what happened to the gays.
- PorcelainLark
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
It's not illegal but it will get you banned from most sites. It's heavily suppressed through the decisions of private companies making it seem de facto illegal. I wouldn't be surprised if they make it illegal soon, there would be widespread popular support if a law came up suppressing it. For comparison, I think I recall reading that Paypal won't allow financial transactions relating to lolicon/shotacon.
That's why it's important to push back against demagoguery and populism; the more the liberal establishment loses ground, the more populism will give license to authoritarians. Anarchists are naive to think letting the system burn will make things better.
That's why it's important to push back against demagoguery and populism; the more the liberal establishment loses ground, the more populism will give license to authoritarians. Anarchists are naive to think letting the system burn will make things better.
Formerly WandersGlade.
Male, Straight, non-exclusive.
Ideal AoA: 8-10.
To understand something is to be delivered of it. - Baruch Spinoza
Male, Straight, non-exclusive.
Ideal AoA: 8-10.
To understand something is to be delivered of it. - Baruch Spinoza
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
I have written a paper on the subject of pedophilia and incest based on my study on human history. I have already given it in a like in my early introduction which is <https://anticorruptionfight.blogspot.com/>
The Basic premises of its starting page is in the following
Theoretical Rough Draft Part - I
BASIC PRIMISES
PAEDOPHILIA AND INCEST(INBREEDING) ARE MADE INTO THE TWO MOST HATED SEXUAL TABOO BEHAVIOURS IN THE “MODERN” AGE HUMAN SOCIETY. HOWEVER, I DO BELIEVE THE FEAR AND HATRED AGAINST PEDOPHILIA AND INCEST ARE REAL, STEMS FROM GENUINE CONCERN OF THE PEOPLE.
HOWEVER, PEDOPHILIA AND INBREEDING WERE BASICALLY THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT COMPONENTS THAT WERE ESSENTIAL FOR THE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF HUMAN RACE THROUGH OUT THEIR HISTORY. I OPENLY CHALLENGE ANYONE WHO REPUDIATE THE ABOVE HISTORICAL FACTS BASICALLY ON THE SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS, SHOULD COME FORWARD TO PROVE ME WRONG.
I CONSIDER THE TERM “PEDOPHILIA” MEANING “LOVERS OF CHILDREN”, IS A MISNOMER. ALSO THE DEFINITION OF A “CHILD” SAID TO BE INCAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENT ON THEIR SEXUAL MATTERS IS CONTROVERSIAL. I WOULD RATHER PREFER TO CALL IT AS SEXUAL RELATION BETWEEN PERSONS OF YOUNG AND OLD AGE.
ALL HETEROSEXUAL HEALTHY MEN IN GENERAL, MORE OR LESS, NORMALLY ATTRACTED TO THE GIRLS SPECIALLY AROUND THE PUBERTY AGE 10 TO 12 OR MORE. IT IS INBUILD IN THEM BY NATURE. PEOPLE DENYING THIS FACT ARE EITHER BLATANTLY LYING OR SUPRESS THEIR CONSCIOUS MIND TO BECOME PARTIALLY BLIND TO THE REALITY. IT IS COMMONLY CALLED AS "INDOCTRINATION" AND USUALLY HAPPENS IN MANY RELIGIOUS ORDERS WHO TAKE THE OATH OF CELIBACY TO REPRESS THEIR SEXUALITY BUT IT ALWAYS REMAINS IN THEIR SUBCONSCIOUS MIND. YOU CANNOT DENY A SCIENTIFIC TRUTH SIMPLY BECAUSE YOUR MORALITY DON’T AGREE WITH IT.
THE MODERN SOCIAL SCIENCE, BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH ON CHILD SEX CALLED PEDOPHILIA IS GENERALLY BUILD ON UNSCIENTIFIC FRAUDULENT GROUNDS. THERE ARE NOT ANY SUBSTANTIAL COMPREHENSIVE HISTORICAL RECORDS EVIDENCES THAT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVES THAT THE TRADITIONAL SEX BETWEEN THE YOUNG AND OLD CLEARLY RESULTED IN REAL PHYSICAL HARMS, MENTAL DAMAGE VIOLENCE PAIN, CRUELTY SUFFERING AND DISABILITY THAT HAD DESTROYED THE YOUNGER PERSONS ENTIRE LIFE. THE HISTORICAL EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES SHOWS QUITE THE OPPOSITE. SO THE AUTHORITIES CONVERTED PEDOPHILIA INTO A RELIGION, UNQUESTIONABLE ABSOLUTE TRUTH BUT FULL OF SELF-CONTRADICTIONS.
THE MODERN AGE SEX SCHOLARS ASSERTIONS THAT YOUNG PERSONS BELOW A GIVEN AGE INCAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENSUS ON THEIR SEXUAL MATTER, MOSTLY STANDS ON UNSCIENTIFIC BASIS, LIES, PRECONCEIVED IDEALS OF WOMEN’S VERTUES, PREJUDICED MORALS WHICH HAVE BEEN MADE INTO AN ARTICLE OF FAITH, A BLIND BELIEF BUILT LATTER ON FALSIFIED SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS.
PEOPLE DON’T NEED A ROCKET SCIENCE OR SEVERAL YEARS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE ACADEMIC RESEARCH PHD DEGREE TO FIND OUT THE HISTORICAL FACTS AND EVIDENCES I HAVE PROVIDE IN THIS PAPER. IT ONLY NEEDS AN OPEN MINDED AVERAGE INTELLIGENT RATIONAL PERSON WITH THE COMMON SENSE AND A FAIRLY GOOD KNOWLEDGE OF HUMAN PAST HISTORY, WILL BE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND SEE THE REALITY AND THE TRUTHFULNESS GIVEN IN HIS PAPER.
Now can any one please tell me does it come under the criteria of "Glorifying and Normalizing Pedophilia" and get me banned from this site"
The Basic premises of its starting page is in the following
Theoretical Rough Draft Part - I
BASIC PRIMISES
PAEDOPHILIA AND INCEST(INBREEDING) ARE MADE INTO THE TWO MOST HATED SEXUAL TABOO BEHAVIOURS IN THE “MODERN” AGE HUMAN SOCIETY. HOWEVER, I DO BELIEVE THE FEAR AND HATRED AGAINST PEDOPHILIA AND INCEST ARE REAL, STEMS FROM GENUINE CONCERN OF THE PEOPLE.
HOWEVER, PEDOPHILIA AND INBREEDING WERE BASICALLY THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT COMPONENTS THAT WERE ESSENTIAL FOR THE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF HUMAN RACE THROUGH OUT THEIR HISTORY. I OPENLY CHALLENGE ANYONE WHO REPUDIATE THE ABOVE HISTORICAL FACTS BASICALLY ON THE SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS, SHOULD COME FORWARD TO PROVE ME WRONG.
I CONSIDER THE TERM “PEDOPHILIA” MEANING “LOVERS OF CHILDREN”, IS A MISNOMER. ALSO THE DEFINITION OF A “CHILD” SAID TO BE INCAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENT ON THEIR SEXUAL MATTERS IS CONTROVERSIAL. I WOULD RATHER PREFER TO CALL IT AS SEXUAL RELATION BETWEEN PERSONS OF YOUNG AND OLD AGE.
ALL HETEROSEXUAL HEALTHY MEN IN GENERAL, MORE OR LESS, NORMALLY ATTRACTED TO THE GIRLS SPECIALLY AROUND THE PUBERTY AGE 10 TO 12 OR MORE. IT IS INBUILD IN THEM BY NATURE. PEOPLE DENYING THIS FACT ARE EITHER BLATANTLY LYING OR SUPRESS THEIR CONSCIOUS MIND TO BECOME PARTIALLY BLIND TO THE REALITY. IT IS COMMONLY CALLED AS "INDOCTRINATION" AND USUALLY HAPPENS IN MANY RELIGIOUS ORDERS WHO TAKE THE OATH OF CELIBACY TO REPRESS THEIR SEXUALITY BUT IT ALWAYS REMAINS IN THEIR SUBCONSCIOUS MIND. YOU CANNOT DENY A SCIENTIFIC TRUTH SIMPLY BECAUSE YOUR MORALITY DON’T AGREE WITH IT.
THE MODERN SOCIAL SCIENCE, BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH ON CHILD SEX CALLED PEDOPHILIA IS GENERALLY BUILD ON UNSCIENTIFIC FRAUDULENT GROUNDS. THERE ARE NOT ANY SUBSTANTIAL COMPREHENSIVE HISTORICAL RECORDS EVIDENCES THAT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVES THAT THE TRADITIONAL SEX BETWEEN THE YOUNG AND OLD CLEARLY RESULTED IN REAL PHYSICAL HARMS, MENTAL DAMAGE VIOLENCE PAIN, CRUELTY SUFFERING AND DISABILITY THAT HAD DESTROYED THE YOUNGER PERSONS ENTIRE LIFE. THE HISTORICAL EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES SHOWS QUITE THE OPPOSITE. SO THE AUTHORITIES CONVERTED PEDOPHILIA INTO A RELIGION, UNQUESTIONABLE ABSOLUTE TRUTH BUT FULL OF SELF-CONTRADICTIONS.
THE MODERN AGE SEX SCHOLARS ASSERTIONS THAT YOUNG PERSONS BELOW A GIVEN AGE INCAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENSUS ON THEIR SEXUAL MATTER, MOSTLY STANDS ON UNSCIENTIFIC BASIS, LIES, PRECONCEIVED IDEALS OF WOMEN’S VERTUES, PREJUDICED MORALS WHICH HAVE BEEN MADE INTO AN ARTICLE OF FAITH, A BLIND BELIEF BUILT LATTER ON FALSIFIED SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS.
PEOPLE DON’T NEED A ROCKET SCIENCE OR SEVERAL YEARS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE ACADEMIC RESEARCH PHD DEGREE TO FIND OUT THE HISTORICAL FACTS AND EVIDENCES I HAVE PROVIDE IN THIS PAPER. IT ONLY NEEDS AN OPEN MINDED AVERAGE INTELLIGENT RATIONAL PERSON WITH THE COMMON SENSE AND A FAIRLY GOOD KNOWLEDGE OF HUMAN PAST HISTORY, WILL BE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND SEE THE REALITY AND THE TRUTHFULNESS GIVEN IN HIS PAPER.
Now can any one please tell me does it come under the criteria of "Glorifying and Normalizing Pedophilia" and get me banned from this site"
Last edited by Valerian on Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2024 8:54 am
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
That's not glorifying paedophilia: it's stating a palpable factFragment wrote: Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:33 am "Boys are the most beautiful creatures in existence and antis are the ones with the problem because they can't see that."
Seriously, though, I think most people (are conditioned to) conflate tolerance and normalisation. We should call a pedo a pedo (or a nonce, beast, sicko, kiddie-fiddler, two-pin DIN plug...) because calling them "minor attracted" normalises them. (How may times have you heard that?) The moment one relinquishes the notion that we're disgusting perverts who should be fed to the woodchipper then come the accusations of promoting child abuse.
Yet in reality, it's hate-speech that's illegal, not our orientation.
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
Youth/adult romance is legal so long as there is no sexually motivated intimacy.
It takes a good adult to be romantic with a child without causing troubles & problems, requires a squeaky clean mind with moral fiber.
However, the majority of people have incredibly dirty minds and you cannot change that.
Nobody will ever believe that you're a good person, ever. People don't have minds clean enough to imagine that, and they never will have.
Normalizing the fact that little girls are pretty, dressing them up fancy so they can sing and dance in celebration of youth & beauty, I think is a solution to "bad" pedophilia. There will be less bad pedophiles around when they've seen a more proper example of conduct, what's right vs. what's wrong. Pedophilia is never going to go away.
VoA is the final solution
It is. There should be 40 of them.
I truly believe that is the way forward.
It takes a good adult to be romantic with a child without causing troubles & problems, requires a squeaky clean mind with moral fiber.
However, the majority of people have incredibly dirty minds and you cannot change that.
Nobody will ever believe that you're a good person, ever. People don't have minds clean enough to imagine that, and they never will have.
Normalizing the fact that little girls are pretty, dressing them up fancy so they can sing and dance in celebration of youth & beauty, I think is a solution to "bad" pedophilia. There will be less bad pedophiles around when they've seen a more proper example of conduct, what's right vs. what's wrong. Pedophilia is never going to go away.
VoA is the final solution
It is. There should be 40 of them.
I truly believe that is the way forward.
Re: Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing condoms legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing prostitution legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing pornography legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing interracial marriage legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing homosexual relationship legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing cannabis legal ?
All these things were really illegal at different times.
Is 'glorifying/normalizing prostitution legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing pornography legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing interracial marriage legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing homosexual relationship legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing cannabis legal ?
All these things were really illegal at different times.