Contact Debate - ethics of the logical categories

A place to debate contact stances and possible reforms. You can express pro-c, pro-reform, or anti-c views. Just be respectful and do not advocate engaging in criminalized sexual relationships.

What age should penis contact and or gential stimulation be allowed on a minor?

Higher then 18yo due to frontal lobe development completing at 25yo and or feminist concerns
0
No votes
18yo because its tried and true for modern society that strikes balance
0
No votes
14-17yo ebohebephilia, hormones are at their peek so that makes sex consent applicable
0
No votes
11.5-15yo completion of tanner stage four is technical sexual maturity so that makes sex consent applicable
1
20%
8-11yo The very earliest signs or partial steps of puberty happened so that makes sex consent applicable
1
20%
5.5-7yo The waldorf model of the brain shows stability as opposed to just passive and absorbant behaviors makes sex consent applicable
0
No votes
3-5yo They form normal memories, start talking and are potty trained so that makes sex consent applicable
1
20%
0-2yo The very concept of consent needs to be challenged entirely with a radical overhaul of all norms
2
40%
 
Total votes: 5

Online
DANAT4T
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2025 4:02 pm

Re: Contact Debate - ethics of the logical categories

Post by DANAT4T »

PorcelainLark wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:57 pm
DANAT4T wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:42 pm The 7th option references bathroom etiquette which is a social construct.
Ah, I was thinking of the stuff about memory.
If consent was based on memory, people with dementia would not be capable of consent either. I regard that particular issue as irrelevant.
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.💘
User avatar
Learning to undeny
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:22 pm

Re: Contact Debate - ethics of the logical categories

Post by Learning to undeny »

PorcelainLark wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:30 pm I can only base it on my experience, but I would expect the ability to have an orgasm isn't contingent on whether you've reached puberty.
What I meant is that I don't know if there is anything risky about an infant/toddler having an orgasm, even though they occasionally happen. I know that orgasms are normal long before puberty, but I do not know if they are unsafe before a certain (5? 2?) age, as I do not recall seeing positive/neutral experiences of orgasm that young (an alternative explanation is that they would forget).
Spoiler!
Do not spoil what you have by desiring what you have not; remember that what you now have was once among the things you only hoped for. — Epicurus
Scorchingwilde
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2025 10:40 am

Re: Contact Debate - ethics of the logical categories

Post by Scorchingwilde »

Learning to undeny wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 12:44 am
PorcelainLark wrote: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:30 pm I can only base it on my experience, but I would expect the ability to have an orgasm isn't contingent on whether you've reached puberty.
What I meant is that I don't know if there is anything risky about an infant/toddler having an orgasm, even though they occasionally happen. I know that orgasms are normal long before puberty, but I do not know if they are unsafe before a certain (5? 2?) age, as I do not recall seeing positive/neutral experiences of orgasm that young (an alternative explanation is that they would forget).
I had firsthand experience with self-induced orgasms when I was 5 that were positive, repeated relatively frequently when I had the chance and felt like it, and didn't seem to cause any harm. I could have been 4 or 3 and have memories of those, I don't really remember a time when I didn't, but time gets blurry that far back and the most time-specific memory I have is of worrying about being caught at school.
Never forget what you are, the rest of the world will not
Post Reply